CEO power, regulatory pressures, and carbon emissions: An emerging market perspective

This study examines whether powerful CEOs and the strength of the regulatory pressures influence firms’ decisions to disclose their carbon emissions. Powerful CEOs are examined in three dimensions, i.e. CEO ownership power, CEO structural power, and CEO expert power. Focusing on firms listed on Burs...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cogent Business and Management
Main Author: Abdul Majid J.; Che Adam N.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogent OA 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85175979870&doi=10.1080%2f23311975.2023.2276555&partnerID=40&md5=33938cebcf7e2935b00bd163c966cd5a
id 2-s2.0-85175979870
spelling 2-s2.0-85175979870
Abdul Majid J.; Che Adam N.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
CEO power, regulatory pressures, and carbon emissions: An emerging market perspective
2023
Cogent Business and Management
10
3
10.1080/23311975.2023.2276555
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85175979870&doi=10.1080%2f23311975.2023.2276555&partnerID=40&md5=33938cebcf7e2935b00bd163c966cd5a
This study examines whether powerful CEOs and the strength of the regulatory pressures influence firms’ decisions to disclose their carbon emissions. Powerful CEOs are examined in three dimensions, i.e. CEO ownership power, CEO structural power, and CEO expert power. Focusing on firms listed on Bursa Malaysia and employing logistic regression models with clustered standard errors, the results show a negative association between CEO ownership power, measured in terms of ownership interest, and firms’ decisions to disclose carbon emissions. These results align with the findings of prior studies and provide support for agency theory, suggesting that entrenchment effects occur when CEOs own large ownership interest in the firms, thus adversely impacting carbon disclosure decisions. The results also show a positive association between the strength of the regulatory pressures and carbon disclosure decisions, supporting the institutional theory prediction that firms respond to external pressures by adjusting their organizational structure. These inferences are robust to additional sensitivity analyses, including the Heckman’s (1979) selection bias correction, alternative specifications of the ownership interests, and validation of the regulatory pressures. The results demonstrate that an indirect pressure exerted by Bursa Malaysia through the adoption of mandatory sustainability reporting has a positive impact on carbon disclosure. To further enhance carbon emissions reporting, it is timely for regulators to consider implementing direct measures, such as mandatory GHG reporting, to address associated challenges. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Cogent OA
23311975
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Abdul Majid J.; Che Adam N.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
spellingShingle Abdul Majid J.; Che Adam N.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
CEO power, regulatory pressures, and carbon emissions: An emerging market perspective
author_facet Abdul Majid J.; Che Adam N.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
author_sort Abdul Majid J.; Che Adam N.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
title CEO power, regulatory pressures, and carbon emissions: An emerging market perspective
title_short CEO power, regulatory pressures, and carbon emissions: An emerging market perspective
title_full CEO power, regulatory pressures, and carbon emissions: An emerging market perspective
title_fullStr CEO power, regulatory pressures, and carbon emissions: An emerging market perspective
title_full_unstemmed CEO power, regulatory pressures, and carbon emissions: An emerging market perspective
title_sort CEO power, regulatory pressures, and carbon emissions: An emerging market perspective
publishDate 2023
container_title Cogent Business and Management
container_volume 10
container_issue 3
doi_str_mv 10.1080/23311975.2023.2276555
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85175979870&doi=10.1080%2f23311975.2023.2276555&partnerID=40&md5=33938cebcf7e2935b00bd163c966cd5a
description This study examines whether powerful CEOs and the strength of the regulatory pressures influence firms’ decisions to disclose their carbon emissions. Powerful CEOs are examined in three dimensions, i.e. CEO ownership power, CEO structural power, and CEO expert power. Focusing on firms listed on Bursa Malaysia and employing logistic regression models with clustered standard errors, the results show a negative association between CEO ownership power, measured in terms of ownership interest, and firms’ decisions to disclose carbon emissions. These results align with the findings of prior studies and provide support for agency theory, suggesting that entrenchment effects occur when CEOs own large ownership interest in the firms, thus adversely impacting carbon disclosure decisions. The results also show a positive association between the strength of the regulatory pressures and carbon disclosure decisions, supporting the institutional theory prediction that firms respond to external pressures by adjusting their organizational structure. These inferences are robust to additional sensitivity analyses, including the Heckman’s (1979) selection bias correction, alternative specifications of the ownership interests, and validation of the regulatory pressures. The results demonstrate that an indirect pressure exerted by Bursa Malaysia through the adoption of mandatory sustainability reporting has a positive impact on carbon disclosure. To further enhance carbon emissions reporting, it is timely for regulators to consider implementing direct measures, such as mandatory GHG reporting, to address associated challenges. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
publisher Cogent OA
issn 23311975
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678156527828992