Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms

This study examines strategic response towards climate change mitigation by listed firms in the energy sector in Malaysia from 2010 to 2019. It also examines whether institutional pressures and attributes of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) drive such strategic response. Using a TwoStep cluster ana...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cogent Business and Management
Main Author: Abdul Majid J.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogent OA 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85174153286&doi=10.1080%2f23311975.2023.2266166&partnerID=40&md5=9bd92b4f68de67e64558c5bedf48edbb
id 2-s2.0-85174153286
spelling 2-s2.0-85174153286
Abdul Majid J.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms
2023
Cogent Business and Management
10
3
10.1080/23311975.2023.2266166
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85174153286&doi=10.1080%2f23311975.2023.2266166&partnerID=40&md5=9bd92b4f68de67e64558c5bedf48edbb
This study examines strategic response towards climate change mitigation by listed firms in the energy sector in Malaysia from 2010 to 2019. It also examines whether institutional pressures and attributes of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) drive such strategic response. Using a TwoStep cluster analysis, and based on 271 firm-year observations, the results show that there are two types of strategic response portrayed by the energy firms, i.e. indifferent and emerging. To analyze the determinants of the firms’ strategic response, two logistic regression techniques are employed, i.e. robust standard errors clustered by firms and lagged structure approach. The results suggest that firms strategic response is shaped by institutional pressures and CEOs attributes, namely, CEOs with international experiences, and CEOs who have experiences in addressing environmental issues. These inferences are robust to several sensitivity tests, including the lagged structure approach, Heckman’s (1979) selection bias correction, an alternative measure of firms’ strategic responses, a matched-sample approach, and controlling for possible international pressures faced by the firms. Overall, the results indicate that in emerging countries, such as Malaysia, with weak pressures from non-governmental organizations, both the government and CEOs need to play dominant roles in addressing climate change issue. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Cogent OA
23311975
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Abdul Majid J.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
spellingShingle Abdul Majid J.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms
author_facet Abdul Majid J.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
author_sort Abdul Majid J.; Ab Rahim N.; Razak R.
title Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms
title_short Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms
title_full Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms
title_fullStr Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms
title_full_unstemmed Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms
title_sort Institutional pressures, CEOs’ attributes, and strategic response towards climate change mitigation: The case of energy firms
publishDate 2023
container_title Cogent Business and Management
container_volume 10
container_issue 3
doi_str_mv 10.1080/23311975.2023.2266166
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85174153286&doi=10.1080%2f23311975.2023.2266166&partnerID=40&md5=9bd92b4f68de67e64558c5bedf48edbb
description This study examines strategic response towards climate change mitigation by listed firms in the energy sector in Malaysia from 2010 to 2019. It also examines whether institutional pressures and attributes of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) drive such strategic response. Using a TwoStep cluster analysis, and based on 271 firm-year observations, the results show that there are two types of strategic response portrayed by the energy firms, i.e. indifferent and emerging. To analyze the determinants of the firms’ strategic response, two logistic regression techniques are employed, i.e. robust standard errors clustered by firms and lagged structure approach. The results suggest that firms strategic response is shaped by institutional pressures and CEOs attributes, namely, CEOs with international experiences, and CEOs who have experiences in addressing environmental issues. These inferences are robust to several sensitivity tests, including the lagged structure approach, Heckman’s (1979) selection bias correction, an alternative measure of firms’ strategic responses, a matched-sample approach, and controlling for possible international pressures faced by the firms. Overall, the results indicate that in emerging countries, such as Malaysia, with weak pressures from non-governmental organizations, both the government and CEOs need to play dominant roles in addressing climate change issue. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
publisher Cogent OA
issn 23311975
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871797462269952