Numerical and ensemble machine learning-based investigation of the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal device equipped with a perforated twisted tube turbulator

The current research was carried out with the aim of numerically investigating the effect of employing a perforated twisted tube turbulator on the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal (PVT) device. The simulations were performed in 4 different Reynolds numbers (Re) (i.e....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
Main Author: Wang G.; Hai T.; Paw J.K.S.; Pasupuleti J.; Abdalla A.N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85164670953&doi=10.1016%2fj.enganabound.2023.06.033&partnerID=40&md5=cf6b204d2331549b0d0bbc6c04a0ee6a
id 2-s2.0-85164670953
spelling 2-s2.0-85164670953
Wang G.; Hai T.; Paw J.K.S.; Pasupuleti J.; Abdalla A.N.
Numerical and ensemble machine learning-based investigation of the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal device equipped with a perforated twisted tube turbulator
2023
Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
155

10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.06.033
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85164670953&doi=10.1016%2fj.enganabound.2023.06.033&partnerID=40&md5=cf6b204d2331549b0d0bbc6c04a0ee6a
The current research was carried out with the aim of numerically investigating the effect of employing a perforated twisted tube turbulator on the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal (PVT) device. The simulations were performed in 4 different Reynolds numbers (Re) (i.e. 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000) and considering 4 different twist distance (TD) (i.e. L/25, L/50, L/70, and L/100) for the non-perforated turbulator and three different perforated turbulators (with 1, 2, and 3 holes) with TD = L/100. Among the examined cases, the best and worst performance belonged to the PVT device with perforated turbulator and without a turbulator, respectively. For the PVT device with non-perforated turbulator, the lowest PV panel temperature, the highest water outlet temperature, and the highest energy and exergy efficiencies occurred at the highest Re (i.e. 2000) and the lowest TD (i.e. L/100). Also, it was revealed that among the examined perforated turbulators, the best performance belongs to the turbulator with 3 holes in each pitch. In this case, the temperature of the PV panel, the overall energy efficiency and the overall exergy efficiency of the PVT device are respectively 3 ºC lower, 7.43% higher and 3.21% higher than the case without turbulator. As another novelty, a new ensemble machine learning model, namely boosted regression tree (BRT) was developed to simulation of the overall energy and exergy efficiencies based on the Reynolds number and volume fraction. The outcomes revealed the promising accuracy for both targets in terms various statistical metrics. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
Elsevier Ltd
9557997
English
Article

author Wang G.; Hai T.; Paw J.K.S.; Pasupuleti J.; Abdalla A.N.
spellingShingle Wang G.; Hai T.; Paw J.K.S.; Pasupuleti J.; Abdalla A.N.
Numerical and ensemble machine learning-based investigation of the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal device equipped with a perforated twisted tube turbulator
author_facet Wang G.; Hai T.; Paw J.K.S.; Pasupuleti J.; Abdalla A.N.
author_sort Wang G.; Hai T.; Paw J.K.S.; Pasupuleti J.; Abdalla A.N.
title Numerical and ensemble machine learning-based investigation of the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal device equipped with a perforated twisted tube turbulator
title_short Numerical and ensemble machine learning-based investigation of the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal device equipped with a perforated twisted tube turbulator
title_full Numerical and ensemble machine learning-based investigation of the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal device equipped with a perforated twisted tube turbulator
title_fullStr Numerical and ensemble machine learning-based investigation of the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal device equipped with a perforated twisted tube turbulator
title_full_unstemmed Numerical and ensemble machine learning-based investigation of the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal device equipped with a perforated twisted tube turbulator
title_sort Numerical and ensemble machine learning-based investigation of the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal device equipped with a perforated twisted tube turbulator
publishDate 2023
container_title Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
container_volume 155
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.enganabound.2023.06.033
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85164670953&doi=10.1016%2fj.enganabound.2023.06.033&partnerID=40&md5=cf6b204d2331549b0d0bbc6c04a0ee6a
description The current research was carried out with the aim of numerically investigating the effect of employing a perforated twisted tube turbulator on the energy and exergy yields of a concentrating photovoltaic thermal (PVT) device. The simulations were performed in 4 different Reynolds numbers (Re) (i.e. 500, 1000, 1500 and 2000) and considering 4 different twist distance (TD) (i.e. L/25, L/50, L/70, and L/100) for the non-perforated turbulator and three different perforated turbulators (with 1, 2, and 3 holes) with TD = L/100. Among the examined cases, the best and worst performance belonged to the PVT device with perforated turbulator and without a turbulator, respectively. For the PVT device with non-perforated turbulator, the lowest PV panel temperature, the highest water outlet temperature, and the highest energy and exergy efficiencies occurred at the highest Re (i.e. 2000) and the lowest TD (i.e. L/100). Also, it was revealed that among the examined perforated turbulators, the best performance belongs to the turbulator with 3 holes in each pitch. In this case, the temperature of the PV panel, the overall energy efficiency and the overall exergy efficiency of the PVT device are respectively 3 ºC lower, 7.43% higher and 3.21% higher than the case without turbulator. As another novelty, a new ensemble machine learning model, namely boosted regression tree (BRT) was developed to simulation of the overall energy and exergy efficiencies based on the Reynolds number and volume fraction. The outcomes revealed the promising accuracy for both targets in terms various statistical metrics. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
publisher Elsevier Ltd
issn 9557997
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677580875333632