Fine-tuning optimization of poly lactic acid impact strength with variation of plasticizer using simple supervised machine learning methods
The use of machine learning to fine-tune the properties of materials is a remarkable achievement in the 21st century. Three machine learning (ML) methods were used to fine-tune and optimize the impact strength of polylactic acid (PLA) with different plasticizers: KNN (K-nearest neighbors), SVR (Supp...
Published in: | Express Polymer Letters |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BME-PT and GTE
2023
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85164596409&doi=10.3144%2fexpresspolymlett.2023.71&partnerID=40&md5=adcc14241fb2e56fc067ab0e5d9396d2 |
id |
2-s2.0-85164596409 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85164596409 Fatriansyah J.F.; Kustiyah E.; Surip S.N.; Federico A.; Pradana A.F.; Handayani A.S.; Jaafar M.; Dhaneswara D. Fine-tuning optimization of poly lactic acid impact strength with variation of plasticizer using simple supervised machine learning methods 2023 Express Polymer Letters 17 9 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2023.71 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85164596409&doi=10.3144%2fexpresspolymlett.2023.71&partnerID=40&md5=adcc14241fb2e56fc067ab0e5d9396d2 The use of machine learning to fine-tune the properties of materials is a remarkable achievement in the 21st century. Three machine learning (ML) methods were used to fine-tune and optimize the impact strength of polylactic acid (PLA) with different plasticizers: KNN (K-nearest neighbors), SVR (Support Vector Regression), and ANN (artificial neural net-works). The results demonstrated that, though ANN reached a higher R2 score of 0.901 than the other two ML methods, KNN, with an R2 score of 0.839, showed more stability than ANN. Based on the current research, KNN is recommended for experimentalists to fine-tune the impact strength of variational plasticizers. The experiment study case with polyethylene glycol 1000 (PEG1000) and octyl epoxy stearate (OES) plasticizer showed good agreement and prediction with experiments. It even showed the fine-tuned impact strength as a function of plasticizer content results, which cannot be achieved by only experiments. © BMEPT. BME-PT and GTE 1788618X English Article All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
author |
Fatriansyah J.F.; Kustiyah E.; Surip S.N.; Federico A.; Pradana A.F.; Handayani A.S.; Jaafar M.; Dhaneswara D. |
spellingShingle |
Fatriansyah J.F.; Kustiyah E.; Surip S.N.; Federico A.; Pradana A.F.; Handayani A.S.; Jaafar M.; Dhaneswara D. Fine-tuning optimization of poly lactic acid impact strength with variation of plasticizer using simple supervised machine learning methods |
author_facet |
Fatriansyah J.F.; Kustiyah E.; Surip S.N.; Federico A.; Pradana A.F.; Handayani A.S.; Jaafar M.; Dhaneswara D. |
author_sort |
Fatriansyah J.F.; Kustiyah E.; Surip S.N.; Federico A.; Pradana A.F.; Handayani A.S.; Jaafar M.; Dhaneswara D. |
title |
Fine-tuning optimization of poly lactic acid impact strength with variation of plasticizer using simple supervised machine learning methods |
title_short |
Fine-tuning optimization of poly lactic acid impact strength with variation of plasticizer using simple supervised machine learning methods |
title_full |
Fine-tuning optimization of poly lactic acid impact strength with variation of plasticizer using simple supervised machine learning methods |
title_fullStr |
Fine-tuning optimization of poly lactic acid impact strength with variation of plasticizer using simple supervised machine learning methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Fine-tuning optimization of poly lactic acid impact strength with variation of plasticizer using simple supervised machine learning methods |
title_sort |
Fine-tuning optimization of poly lactic acid impact strength with variation of plasticizer using simple supervised machine learning methods |
publishDate |
2023 |
container_title |
Express Polymer Letters |
container_volume |
17 |
container_issue |
9 |
doi_str_mv |
10.3144/expresspolymlett.2023.71 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85164596409&doi=10.3144%2fexpresspolymlett.2023.71&partnerID=40&md5=adcc14241fb2e56fc067ab0e5d9396d2 |
description |
The use of machine learning to fine-tune the properties of materials is a remarkable achievement in the 21st century. Three machine learning (ML) methods were used to fine-tune and optimize the impact strength of polylactic acid (PLA) with different plasticizers: KNN (K-nearest neighbors), SVR (Support Vector Regression), and ANN (artificial neural net-works). The results demonstrated that, though ANN reached a higher R2 score of 0.901 than the other two ML methods, KNN, with an R2 score of 0.839, showed more stability than ANN. Based on the current research, KNN is recommended for experimentalists to fine-tune the impact strength of variational plasticizers. The experiment study case with polyethylene glycol 1000 (PEG1000) and octyl epoxy stearate (OES) plasticizer showed good agreement and prediction with experiments. It even showed the fine-tuned impact strength as a function of plasticizer content results, which cannot be achieved by only experiments. © BMEPT. |
publisher |
BME-PT and GTE |
issn |
1788618X |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1809677887203180544 |