How to select healthy sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in samples with high sperm DNA fragmentation?

How to select healthy sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in samples with high sperm DNA fragmentation?

The body of evidence supports the negative impact of increased sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) on natural fertility as well as assisted reproduction conditions. High SDF has been correlated with low pregnancy and delivery rates following intrauterine insemination. Also, high SDF is accused of reducing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Panminerva Medica
Main Author: Garrido N.; Gül M.; Jindal S.; Vogiatzi P.; Saleh R.; Durairajanayagam D.; Parmegiani L.; Boitrelle F.; Colpi G.M.; Agarwal A.
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: Edizioni Minerva Medica 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85164255522&doi=10.23736%2fS0031-0808.23.04870-X&partnerID=40&md5=4e4a7bac91603f2a5b37fc76a3cc97f0
Description
Summary:The body of evidence supports the negative impact of increased sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) on natural fertility as well as assisted reproduction conditions. High SDF has been correlated with low pregnancy and delivery rates following intrauterine insemination. Also, high SDF is accused of reducing the rates of fertilization, implantation, pregnancy, and live birth following in-vitro fertilization (IVF). Despite no impact of high SDF on fertilization or pregnancy rates following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), it has been correlated with poor embryo quality and a higher risk of miscarriage. Several methods have been introduced to help select sperm with the best DNA quality to be used in assisted reproductive technology procedures. These include magnetic-activated cell sorting, intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection, physiologic ICSI, and microfluidic sperm sorters, among others. This article aimed to discuss the impact of high SDF in infertile men on the reproductive outcome of couples undergoing IVF/ICSI. Additionally, this review highlights the principles, advantages, and limitations of different techniques that are currently used for the selection of sperm with intact DNA to be utilized for ICSI. © 2023 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.
ISSN:310808
DOI:10.23736/S0031-0808.23.04870-X

Similar Items

  • Sperm DNA fragmentation test: usefulness in assessing male fertility and assisted reproductive technology outcomes
    by: Evgeni E.; Sabbaghian M.; Saleh R.; Gül M.; Vogiatzi P.; Durairajanayagam D.; Jindal S.; Parmegiani L.; Boitrelle F.; Colpi G.; Agarwal A.
    Published: (2023)
  • Sperm morphology assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection: Reliable results require focus on standardization, quality control, and training
    by: Agarwal A.; Sharma R.; Gupta S.; Finelli R.; Parekh N.; Selvam M.K.P.; Henkel R.; Durairajanayagam D.; Pompeu C.; Madani S.; Belo A.; Singh N.; Covarrubias S.; Darbandi S.; Sadeghi R.; Darbandi M.; Vogiatzi P.; Boitrelle F.; Simopoulou M.; Saleh R.; Arafa M.; Majzoub A.; Kandil H.; Zini A.; Ko E.; Alvarez J.G.; Martinez M.; Ramsay J.; Jindal S.; Busetto G.M.; Sallam H.; Maldonado I.; Anagnostopoulou C.; Alves M.G.; Sengupta P.; Gilany K.; Evenson D.P.; Lewis S.E.M.; Gosalvez J.; Ambar R.F.; Shah R.
    Published: (2021)
  • Sperm DNA fragmentation: A new guideline for clinicians
    by: Agarwal A.; Majzoub A.; Baskaran S.; Selvam M.K.P.; Cho C.L.; Henkel R.; Finelli R.; Leisegang K.; Sengupta P.; Barbarosie C.; Parekh N.; Alves M.G.; Ko E.; Arafa M.; Tadros N.; Ramasamy R.; Kavoussi P.; Ambar R.; Kuchakulla M.; Robert K.A.; Iovine C.; Durairajanayagam D.; Jindal S.; Shah R.
    Published: (2020)
  • Sperm epigenetics landscape: correlation with embryo quality, reproductive outcomes and offspring’s health
    by: Garrido N.; Boitrelle F.; Saleh R.; Durairajanayagam D.; Colpi G.; Agarwal A.
    Published: (2023)
  • Controversy and Consensus on Indications for Sperm DNA Fragmentation Testing in Male Infertility: A Global Survey, Current Guidelines, and Expert Recommendations
    by: Agarwal A.; Farkouh A.; Saleh R.; Hamoda T.A.-A.A.-M.; Harraz A.M.; Kavoussi P.; Arafa M.; Salvio G.; Rambhatla A.; Toprak T.; Gül M.; Phuoc N.H.V.; Boitrelle F.; Birowo P.; Ghayda R.A.; Cannarella R.; Kuroda S.; Durairajanayagam D.; Zini A.; Wyns C.; Sarikaya S.; Tremellen K.; Mostafa T.; Sokolakis I.; Evenson D.P.; Henkel R.; Zohdy W.; Chung E.; Ziouziou I.; Falcone M.; Russo G.I.; Al-Hashimi M.; Calogero A.E.; Ko E.; Colpi G.; Lewis S.; Serefoglu E.C.; Bahar F.; Martinez M.; Nguyen Q.; Ambar R.F.; Bakircioglu M.E.; Kandil H.; Mogharabian N.; Sabbaghian M.; Taniguchi H.; Tsujimura A.; Sajadi H.; Ibrahim W.; Atmoko W.; Vogiatzi P.; Gunes S.; Gilani M.A.S.; Roychoudhury S.; Güngör N.D.; Hakim L.; Adriansjah R.; Kothari P.; Jindal S.; Amar E.; Park H.J.; Long T.Q.T.; Homa S.; Karthikeyan V.S.; Zilaitiene B.; Rosas I.M.; Marino A.; Pescatori E.; Ozer C.; Akhavizadegan H.; Garrido N.; Busetto G.M.; Adamyan A.; Al-Marhoon M.; Elbardisi H.; Dolati P.; Darbandi M.; Darbandi S.; Balercia G.; Pinggera G.-M.; Micic S.; Ho C.C.K.; Moussa M.; Preto M.; Zenoaga-Barbăroșie C.; Smith R.P.; Kosgi R.; de la Rosette J.; El-Sakka A.I.; Abumelha S.M.; Mierzwa T.C.; Ong T.A.; Banihani S.A.; Bowa K.; Fukuhara S.; Boeri L.; Danacıoğlu Y.O.; Gokalp F.; Selim O.M.; Cho C.-L.; Tadros N.N.; Ugur M.R.; Ozkent M.S.; Chiu P.; Kalkanli A.; Khalafalla K.; Vishwakarma R.B.; Finocchi F.; Andreadakis S.; Giulioni C.; Çeker G.; Ceyhan E.; Malhotra V.; Yilmaz M.; Timpano M.; Barrett T.L.; Kim S.H.K.; Ahn S.-T.; Giacone F.; Palani A.; Duarsa G.W.K.; Kadioglu A.; Gadda F.; Zylbersztejn D.S.; Aydos K.; Kulaksız D.; Gupte D.; Calik G.; Karna K.K.; Drakopoulos P.; Baser A.; Kumar V.; Molina J.M.C.; Rajmil O.; Ferreira R.H.; Leonardi S.; Avoyan A.; Sogutdelen E.; Franco G.; Ramsay J.; Ramirez L.; Shah R.; Gherabi N.; Kahraman O.; Trotta C.; Rocco L.; Ngoo K.S.; Sallam H.; El Meliegy A.; Alhathal N.; Chien K.; Lee J.; Le T.V.
    Published: (2023)