Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Clinical Study
Digital impression provides several advantages in implant prosthodontics; however, its use in full-arch rehabilitations, especially immediately after surgery, has yet to be validated. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the fit of immediate full-arch prostheses, fabricated using con...
Published in: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
2023
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85160552199&doi=10.3390%2fjcm12103452&partnerID=40&md5=c91da9210a5e01681689127f7b59a85c |
id |
2-s2.0-85160552199 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85160552199 De Angelis N.; Pesce P.; De Lorenzi M.; Menini M. Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Clinical Study 2023 Journal of Clinical Medicine 12 10 10.3390/jcm12103452 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85160552199&doi=10.3390%2fjcm12103452&partnerID=40&md5=c91da9210a5e01681689127f7b59a85c Digital impression provides several advantages in implant prosthodontics; however, its use in full-arch rehabilitations, especially immediately after surgery, has yet to be validated. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the fit of immediate full-arch prostheses, fabricated using conventional or digital impressions. Patients requiring a full-arch immediate loading rehabilitation were divided into three groups: T1 (digital impression taken immediately after surgery), T2 (Preoperative digital impression, guided surgery—prefabricated temporary bridge) and C (conventional impression taken immediately after surgery). Immediate temporary prostheses were delivered within 24 h after surgery. X-rays were obtained at the time of prosthesis delivery and at the 2-year follow-up. Primary outcomes were cumulative survival rate (CSR) and prosthesis fit. Secondary outcomes were marginal bone level (MBL) and patient satisfaction. One hundred and fifty patients were treated from 2018 to 2020, with 50 in each group. Seven implants failed during the observation period. The CSR was 99% for T1, 98% for T2 and 99.5% for C. A statistically significant difference in prosthesis fit was found among T1 and T2 vs. C. A statistically significant difference was found in the MBL between T1 and C. The outcomes of the present study suggest that digital impression is a viable alternative to conventional protocols for the realisation of full-arch immediate loading prostheses. © 2023 by the authors. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) 20770383 English Article All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
author |
De Angelis N.; Pesce P.; De Lorenzi M.; Menini M. |
spellingShingle |
De Angelis N.; Pesce P.; De Lorenzi M.; Menini M. Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Clinical Study |
author_facet |
De Angelis N.; Pesce P.; De Lorenzi M.; Menini M. |
author_sort |
De Angelis N.; Pesce P.; De Lorenzi M.; Menini M. |
title |
Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Clinical Study |
title_short |
Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Clinical Study |
title_full |
Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Clinical Study |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Clinical Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Clinical Study |
title_sort |
Evaluation of Prosthetic Marginal Fit and Implant Survival Rates for Conventional and Digital Workflows in Full-Arch Immediate Loading Rehabilitations: A Retrospective Clinical Study |
publishDate |
2023 |
container_title |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
container_volume |
12 |
container_issue |
10 |
doi_str_mv |
10.3390/jcm12103452 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85160552199&doi=10.3390%2fjcm12103452&partnerID=40&md5=c91da9210a5e01681689127f7b59a85c |
description |
Digital impression provides several advantages in implant prosthodontics; however, its use in full-arch rehabilitations, especially immediately after surgery, has yet to be validated. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyse the fit of immediate full-arch prostheses, fabricated using conventional or digital impressions. Patients requiring a full-arch immediate loading rehabilitation were divided into three groups: T1 (digital impression taken immediately after surgery), T2 (Preoperative digital impression, guided surgery—prefabricated temporary bridge) and C (conventional impression taken immediately after surgery). Immediate temporary prostheses were delivered within 24 h after surgery. X-rays were obtained at the time of prosthesis delivery and at the 2-year follow-up. Primary outcomes were cumulative survival rate (CSR) and prosthesis fit. Secondary outcomes were marginal bone level (MBL) and patient satisfaction. One hundred and fifty patients were treated from 2018 to 2020, with 50 in each group. Seven implants failed during the observation period. The CSR was 99% for T1, 98% for T2 and 99.5% for C. A statistically significant difference in prosthesis fit was found among T1 and T2 vs. C. A statistically significant difference was found in the MBL between T1 and C. The outcomes of the present study suggest that digital impression is a viable alternative to conventional protocols for the realisation of full-arch immediate loading prostheses. © 2023 by the authors. |
publisher |
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) |
issn |
20770383 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1809677887725371392 |