Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities
This paper investigates the nexus between financial development (FD), institutions, and economic growth using a spatial autoregressive model on a panel dataset of 82 countries from 1990 to 2019. We measure the dependence between countries through geographical and institutional proximity. The latter...
Published in: | International Journal of Finance and Economics |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
John Wiley and Sons Ltd
2024
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148659833&doi=10.1002%2fijfe.2791&partnerID=40&md5=cdf2f5e9bce1270833a49bf602cce457 |
id |
2-s2.0-85148659833 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85148659833 Ahmad M.; Law S.H. Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities 2024 International Journal of Finance and Economics 29 3 10.1002/ijfe.2791 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148659833&doi=10.1002%2fijfe.2791&partnerID=40&md5=cdf2f5e9bce1270833a49bf602cce457 This paper investigates the nexus between financial development (FD), institutions, and economic growth using a spatial autoregressive model on a panel dataset of 82 countries from 1990 to 2019. We measure the dependence between countries through geographical and institutional proximity. The latter has not been widely explored in the finance-growth literature. The concept of institutional proximity proposes that countries with similar institutions will have similar levels of economic growth and larger spillovers once spatial effects of FD and institutional quality are controlled. Overall, our findings support this proposition, as FD and political institutions are shown to have significant positive effects on growth. However, the growth-effect of FD becomes negative beyond a certain threshold. We also find significant positive spatial lag growth in the model, indicating the presence of indirect spillover effects of FD and institutions on the growth of neighbouring countries in both geographical and institutional spheres. Furthermore, the spatial growth model with the institutional proximity matrix exhibits a higher rate of convergence and larger size of spillover than the model with geographical proximity. These findings are robust to various model specifications, and the paper concludes with some policy recommendations. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Ltd 10769307 English Article All Open Access; Green Open Access |
author |
Ahmad M.; Law S.H. |
spellingShingle |
Ahmad M.; Law S.H. Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities |
author_facet |
Ahmad M.; Law S.H. |
author_sort |
Ahmad M.; Law S.H. |
title |
Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities |
title_short |
Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities |
title_full |
Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities |
title_fullStr |
Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities |
title_full_unstemmed |
Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities |
title_sort |
Financial development, institutions, and economic growth nexus: A spatial econometrics analysis using geographical and institutional proximities |
publishDate |
2024 |
container_title |
International Journal of Finance and Economics |
container_volume |
29 |
container_issue |
3 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1002/ijfe.2791 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85148659833&doi=10.1002%2fijfe.2791&partnerID=40&md5=cdf2f5e9bce1270833a49bf602cce457 |
description |
This paper investigates the nexus between financial development (FD), institutions, and economic growth using a spatial autoregressive model on a panel dataset of 82 countries from 1990 to 2019. We measure the dependence between countries through geographical and institutional proximity. The latter has not been widely explored in the finance-growth literature. The concept of institutional proximity proposes that countries with similar institutions will have similar levels of economic growth and larger spillovers once spatial effects of FD and institutional quality are controlled. Overall, our findings support this proposition, as FD and political institutions are shown to have significant positive effects on growth. However, the growth-effect of FD becomes negative beyond a certain threshold. We also find significant positive spatial lag growth in the model, indicating the presence of indirect spillover effects of FD and institutions on the growth of neighbouring countries in both geographical and institutional spheres. Furthermore, the spatial growth model with the institutional proximity matrix exhibits a higher rate of convergence and larger size of spillover than the model with geographical proximity. These findings are robust to various model specifications, and the paper concludes with some policy recommendations. © 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
publisher |
John Wiley and Sons Ltd |
issn |
10769307 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Green Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1814778498891382784 |