Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms

Background: The standard of practice when a superficial lesion was identified during upper GI endoscopy is to take an endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) of the lesion. The histopathologic findings then will determine the management plan. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en-bloc resection...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Main Author: Aliaga Ramos J.; Pedrosa M.S.; Yoshida N.; Abdul Rani R.; Arantes V.N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2023
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85143916750&doi=10.1097%2fMCG.0000000000001541&partnerID=40&md5=4fecdca156c597eb491c693f8fc4d52c
id 2-s2.0-85143916750
spelling 2-s2.0-85143916750
Aliaga Ramos J.; Pedrosa M.S.; Yoshida N.; Abdul Rani R.; Arantes V.N.
Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms
2023
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
57
1
10.1097/MCG.0000000000001541
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85143916750&doi=10.1097%2fMCG.0000000000001541&partnerID=40&md5=4fecdca156c597eb491c693f8fc4d52c
Background: The standard of practice when a superficial lesion was identified during upper GI endoscopy is to take an endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) of the lesion. The histopathologic findings then will determine the management plan. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en-bloc resection for early neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and provides an adequate specimen that permits a more reliable histopathologic assessment. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and specimens resected by ESD, and to identify the predisposing risk factors for this discordance. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study, enrolling patients with superficial gastric neoplasms that underwent EFB followed by ESD. We divided cases to concordant or discordant group according to the histopathologic diagnosis of EFB and ESD specimens. We also analyzed the features that may have influenced the occurrence of histopathologic discordance and the association between discordant samples of adenocarcinoma and neoplastic invasion to deeper layers. Results: A total of 115 gastric ESD procedures were performed with 84 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Histopathologic discordance between EFB and ESD specimens were observed in 35.8% of cases (30/84 lesions). The univariant-bivariant analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that histologic discordance was closely related to the size of the lesions (P=0.028). Conclusion: Histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and ESD specimens may occur in approximately one-third of cases, particularly for lesions over 20 mm, which may lead to crucial delays in gastric cancer precise diagnosis and treatment. © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
1920790
English
Article

author Aliaga Ramos J.; Pedrosa M.S.; Yoshida N.; Abdul Rani R.; Arantes V.N.
spellingShingle Aliaga Ramos J.; Pedrosa M.S.; Yoshida N.; Abdul Rani R.; Arantes V.N.
Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms
author_facet Aliaga Ramos J.; Pedrosa M.S.; Yoshida N.; Abdul Rani R.; Arantes V.N.
author_sort Aliaga Ramos J.; Pedrosa M.S.; Yoshida N.; Abdul Rani R.; Arantes V.N.
title Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms
title_short Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms
title_full Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms
title_fullStr Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms
title_sort Histopathologic Diagnosis Discrepancies between Preoperative Endoscopic Forceps Biopsies and Specimens Resected by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Superficial Gastric Neoplasms
publishDate 2023
container_title Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
container_volume 57
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001541
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85143916750&doi=10.1097%2fMCG.0000000000001541&partnerID=40&md5=4fecdca156c597eb491c693f8fc4d52c
description Background: The standard of practice when a superficial lesion was identified during upper GI endoscopy is to take an endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) of the lesion. The histopathologic findings then will determine the management plan. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) enables en-bloc resection for early neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract and provides an adequate specimen that permits a more reliable histopathologic assessment. The objective of this study was to determine the rate of histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and specimens resected by ESD, and to identify the predisposing risk factors for this discordance. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective study, enrolling patients with superficial gastric neoplasms that underwent EFB followed by ESD. We divided cases to concordant or discordant group according to the histopathologic diagnosis of EFB and ESD specimens. We also analyzed the features that may have influenced the occurrence of histopathologic discordance and the association between discordant samples of adenocarcinoma and neoplastic invasion to deeper layers. Results: A total of 115 gastric ESD procedures were performed with 84 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Histopathologic discordance between EFB and ESD specimens were observed in 35.8% of cases (30/84 lesions). The univariant-bivariant analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that histologic discordance was closely related to the size of the lesions (P=0.028). Conclusion: Histopathologic discrepancy between EFB and ESD specimens may occur in approximately one-third of cases, particularly for lesions over 20 mm, which may lead to crucial delays in gastric cancer precise diagnosis and treatment. © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
publisher Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
issn 1920790
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677681908776960