Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEM 12m Using GNSS-RTK and Airborne IFSAR DEM: A Case Study of Tuba Island, Langkawi

Digital elevation models (DEMs) have been recognized as a primary spatial dataset and essential for numerous scientific applications. The advent of TerraSAR-X for digital elevation measurement (TanDEM-X) has opened a new potential to obtain an accurate DEM. Nowadays, the demand/use of TanDEM-X DEM i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Geoinformatics
Main Author: Pa’suya F.M.; Talib N.; Narashid R.H.; Ahmad Fauzi A.F.; Amri Mohd F.; Abdullah M.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association for Geoinformation Technology 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141458581&doi=10.52939%2fijg.v18i5.2389&partnerID=40&md5=8e64940811a0cac80d870965d6125f64
id 2-s2.0-85141458581
spelling 2-s2.0-85141458581
Pa’suya F.M.; Talib N.; Narashid R.H.; Ahmad Fauzi A.F.; Amri Mohd F.; Abdullah M.A.
Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEM 12m Using GNSS-RTK and Airborne IFSAR DEM: A Case Study of Tuba Island, Langkawi
2022
International Journal of Geoinformatics
18
5
10.52939/ijg.v18i5.2389
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141458581&doi=10.52939%2fijg.v18i5.2389&partnerID=40&md5=8e64940811a0cac80d870965d6125f64
Digital elevation models (DEMs) have been recognized as a primary spatial dataset and essential for numerous scientific applications. The advent of TerraSAR-X for digital elevation measurement (TanDEM-X) has opened a new potential to obtain an accurate DEM. Nowadays, the demand/use of TanDEM-X DEM in scientific applications has become increasingly popular as it offers an alternative to the widely used DEMs: ASTER and SRTM DEM. Although many researches have been conducted to assess the performance of the TanDEM-X DEM at different locations in the world, however, only several multi-regional studies have been performed in Malaysian region. Currently, there are two types of DEMs published by DLR i.e., non-open access (12m and 30m resolution) and open access (90m resolution). In this article, the accuracy of TanDEM-X 12m has been comprehensively and systematically evaluated using 1284 GNSS-RTK control points over Tuba Island and airborne IFSAR-DEM as a reference height. Besides, four available global DEMs: TanDEM-X 90m, AW3D30 DEM, SRTM DEM, and ASTER DEM have also been evaluated to identify the accuracy of TanDEM-X DEM 12m. Based on the evaluation using GNSS-RTK points, TanDEM-X 12m exhibits the highest accuracy with an RMSE of ±1.553m. Unexpectedly, AW3D30 DEM shows a better performance compared to TanDEM-X 90m with RMSE of ±1.964m, followed by SRTM DEM with RMSE of ±3.296m Meanwhile, ASTER DEM exhibits the lowest accuracy with RMSE of ±4.100m The comparison of TanDEM-X 12m and the well-known DEM, SRTM DEM with airborne IFSAR-DEM shows the opposite results. Based on the topographic profile at flat and forest area, the SRTM-DEM exhibits better accuracy than TanDEM-X 12m. © Geoinformatics International.
Association for Geoinformation Technology
16866576
English
Article

author Pa’suya F.M.; Talib N.; Narashid R.H.; Ahmad Fauzi A.F.; Amri Mohd F.; Abdullah M.A.
spellingShingle Pa’suya F.M.; Talib N.; Narashid R.H.; Ahmad Fauzi A.F.; Amri Mohd F.; Abdullah M.A.
Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEM 12m Using GNSS-RTK and Airborne IFSAR DEM: A Case Study of Tuba Island, Langkawi
author_facet Pa’suya F.M.; Talib N.; Narashid R.H.; Ahmad Fauzi A.F.; Amri Mohd F.; Abdullah M.A.
author_sort Pa’suya F.M.; Talib N.; Narashid R.H.; Ahmad Fauzi A.F.; Amri Mohd F.; Abdullah M.A.
title Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEM 12m Using GNSS-RTK and Airborne IFSAR DEM: A Case Study of Tuba Island, Langkawi
title_short Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEM 12m Using GNSS-RTK and Airborne IFSAR DEM: A Case Study of Tuba Island, Langkawi
title_full Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEM 12m Using GNSS-RTK and Airborne IFSAR DEM: A Case Study of Tuba Island, Langkawi
title_fullStr Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEM 12m Using GNSS-RTK and Airborne IFSAR DEM: A Case Study of Tuba Island, Langkawi
title_full_unstemmed Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEM 12m Using GNSS-RTK and Airborne IFSAR DEM: A Case Study of Tuba Island, Langkawi
title_sort Quality Assessment of TanDEM-X DEM 12m Using GNSS-RTK and Airborne IFSAR DEM: A Case Study of Tuba Island, Langkawi
publishDate 2022
container_title International Journal of Geoinformatics
container_volume 18
container_issue 5
doi_str_mv 10.52939/ijg.v18i5.2389
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85141458581&doi=10.52939%2fijg.v18i5.2389&partnerID=40&md5=8e64940811a0cac80d870965d6125f64
description Digital elevation models (DEMs) have been recognized as a primary spatial dataset and essential for numerous scientific applications. The advent of TerraSAR-X for digital elevation measurement (TanDEM-X) has opened a new potential to obtain an accurate DEM. Nowadays, the demand/use of TanDEM-X DEM in scientific applications has become increasingly popular as it offers an alternative to the widely used DEMs: ASTER and SRTM DEM. Although many researches have been conducted to assess the performance of the TanDEM-X DEM at different locations in the world, however, only several multi-regional studies have been performed in Malaysian region. Currently, there are two types of DEMs published by DLR i.e., non-open access (12m and 30m resolution) and open access (90m resolution). In this article, the accuracy of TanDEM-X 12m has been comprehensively and systematically evaluated using 1284 GNSS-RTK control points over Tuba Island and airborne IFSAR-DEM as a reference height. Besides, four available global DEMs: TanDEM-X 90m, AW3D30 DEM, SRTM DEM, and ASTER DEM have also been evaluated to identify the accuracy of TanDEM-X DEM 12m. Based on the evaluation using GNSS-RTK points, TanDEM-X 12m exhibits the highest accuracy with an RMSE of ±1.553m. Unexpectedly, AW3D30 DEM shows a better performance compared to TanDEM-X 90m with RMSE of ±1.964m, followed by SRTM DEM with RMSE of ±3.296m Meanwhile, ASTER DEM exhibits the lowest accuracy with RMSE of ±4.100m The comparison of TanDEM-X 12m and the well-known DEM, SRTM DEM with airborne IFSAR-DEM shows the opposite results. Based on the topographic profile at flat and forest area, the SRTM-DEM exhibits better accuracy than TanDEM-X 12m. © Geoinformatics International.
publisher Association for Geoinformation Technology
issn 16866576
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677592469438464