Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?

E-resources acquisition is a prevalent topic in the global economic crisis. To ensure the continuity of e-resources, librarians venture into various approaches, including evidence-based librarianship (EBL). This study reports librarians' concerns about EBL implementation during the acquisition...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Library and Information Science Research
Main Author: M. A.; A. N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130827067&doi=10.1016%2fj.lisr.2022.101158&partnerID=40&md5=93903964a1fd2721f8bcab338560dc86
id 2-s2.0-85130827067
spelling 2-s2.0-85130827067
M. A.; A. N.
Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?
2022
Library and Information Science Research
44
2
10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101158
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130827067&doi=10.1016%2fj.lisr.2022.101158&partnerID=40&md5=93903964a1fd2721f8bcab338560dc86
E-resources acquisition is a prevalent topic in the global economic crisis. To ensure the continuity of e-resources, librarians venture into various approaches, including evidence-based librarianship (EBL). This study reports librarians' concerns about EBL implementation during the acquisition process. The Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) tools, including the modified Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ) and the Quick Scoring Device, were used to measure the individual librarian stages of concern. The results indicate that the scores for librarians' concerns are at the peak in stage 2 (Self), followed by stage 5 (Collaboration), stage 3 (Management), stage 1 (Informational), and stage 6 (Refocusing), with the lowest score at stage 0 (Unconcern). The findings demonstrate that librarians are more concerned about how EBL implementation could affect themselves (as in Stage 2 (Self)) in performing their tasks as librarians. The results are significant in providing perspectives on individual librarians' sensitivity to EBL implementation as an innovation in their work processes. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Ltd
7408188
English
Article

author M. A.; A. N.
spellingShingle M. A.; A. N.
Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?
author_facet M. A.; A. N.
author_sort M. A.; A. N.
title Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?
title_short Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?
title_full Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?
title_fullStr Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?
title_sort Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?
publishDate 2022
container_title Library and Information Science Research
container_volume 44
container_issue 2
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101158
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130827067&doi=10.1016%2fj.lisr.2022.101158&partnerID=40&md5=93903964a1fd2721f8bcab338560dc86
description E-resources acquisition is a prevalent topic in the global economic crisis. To ensure the continuity of e-resources, librarians venture into various approaches, including evidence-based librarianship (EBL). This study reports librarians' concerns about EBL implementation during the acquisition process. The Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) tools, including the modified Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ) and the Quick Scoring Device, were used to measure the individual librarian stages of concern. The results indicate that the scores for librarians' concerns are at the peak in stage 2 (Self), followed by stage 5 (Collaboration), stage 3 (Management), stage 1 (Informational), and stage 6 (Refocusing), with the lowest score at stage 0 (Unconcern). The findings demonstrate that librarians are more concerned about how EBL implementation could affect themselves (as in Stage 2 (Self)) in performing their tasks as librarians. The results are significant in providing perspectives on individual librarians' sensitivity to EBL implementation as an innovation in their work processes. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
publisher Elsevier Ltd
issn 7408188
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678479841558528