Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?
E-resources acquisition is a prevalent topic in the global economic crisis. To ensure the continuity of e-resources, librarians venture into various approaches, including evidence-based librarianship (EBL). This study reports librarians' concerns about EBL implementation during the acquisition...
Published in: | Library and Information Science Research |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier Ltd
2022
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130827067&doi=10.1016%2fj.lisr.2022.101158&partnerID=40&md5=93903964a1fd2721f8bcab338560dc86 |
id |
2-s2.0-85130827067 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85130827067 M. A.; A. N. Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians? 2022 Library and Information Science Research 44 2 10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101158 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130827067&doi=10.1016%2fj.lisr.2022.101158&partnerID=40&md5=93903964a1fd2721f8bcab338560dc86 E-resources acquisition is a prevalent topic in the global economic crisis. To ensure the continuity of e-resources, librarians venture into various approaches, including evidence-based librarianship (EBL). This study reports librarians' concerns about EBL implementation during the acquisition process. The Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) tools, including the modified Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ) and the Quick Scoring Device, were used to measure the individual librarian stages of concern. The results indicate that the scores for librarians' concerns are at the peak in stage 2 (Self), followed by stage 5 (Collaboration), stage 3 (Management), stage 1 (Informational), and stage 6 (Refocusing), with the lowest score at stage 0 (Unconcern). The findings demonstrate that librarians are more concerned about how EBL implementation could affect themselves (as in Stage 2 (Self)) in performing their tasks as librarians. The results are significant in providing perspectives on individual librarians' sensitivity to EBL implementation as an innovation in their work processes. © 2022 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier Ltd 7408188 English Article |
author |
M. A.; A. N. |
spellingShingle |
M. A.; A. N. Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians? |
author_facet |
M. A.; A. N. |
author_sort |
M. A.; A. N. |
title |
Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians? |
title_short |
Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians? |
title_full |
Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians? |
title_fullStr |
Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians? |
title_sort |
Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians? |
publishDate |
2022 |
container_title |
Library and Information Science Research |
container_volume |
44 |
container_issue |
2 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101158 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130827067&doi=10.1016%2fj.lisr.2022.101158&partnerID=40&md5=93903964a1fd2721f8bcab338560dc86 |
description |
E-resources acquisition is a prevalent topic in the global economic crisis. To ensure the continuity of e-resources, librarians venture into various approaches, including evidence-based librarianship (EBL). This study reports librarians' concerns about EBL implementation during the acquisition process. The Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) tools, including the modified Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ) and the Quick Scoring Device, were used to measure the individual librarian stages of concern. The results indicate that the scores for librarians' concerns are at the peak in stage 2 (Self), followed by stage 5 (Collaboration), stage 3 (Management), stage 1 (Informational), and stage 6 (Refocusing), with the lowest score at stage 0 (Unconcern). The findings demonstrate that librarians are more concerned about how EBL implementation could affect themselves (as in Stage 2 (Self)) in performing their tasks as librarians. The results are significant in providing perspectives on individual librarians' sensitivity to EBL implementation as an innovation in their work processes. © 2022 Elsevier Inc. |
publisher |
Elsevier Ltd |
issn |
7408188 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
|
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1809678479841558528 |