Evidence-based librarianship (EBL) in e-resources acquisition: How concerned are librarians?

E-resources acquisition is a prevalent topic in the global economic crisis. To ensure the continuity of e-resources, librarians venture into various approaches, including evidence-based librarianship (EBL). This study reports librarians' concerns about EBL implementation during the acquisition...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Library and Information Science Research
Main Author: M. A.; A. N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85130827067&doi=10.1016%2fj.lisr.2022.101158&partnerID=40&md5=93903964a1fd2721f8bcab338560dc86
Description
Summary:E-resources acquisition is a prevalent topic in the global economic crisis. To ensure the continuity of e-resources, librarians venture into various approaches, including evidence-based librarianship (EBL). This study reports librarians' concerns about EBL implementation during the acquisition process. The Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) tools, including the modified Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ) and the Quick Scoring Device, were used to measure the individual librarian stages of concern. The results indicate that the scores for librarians' concerns are at the peak in stage 2 (Self), followed by stage 5 (Collaboration), stage 3 (Management), stage 1 (Informational), and stage 6 (Refocusing), with the lowest score at stage 0 (Unconcern). The findings demonstrate that librarians are more concerned about how EBL implementation could affect themselves (as in Stage 2 (Self)) in performing their tasks as librarians. The results are significant in providing perspectives on individual librarians' sensitivity to EBL implementation as an innovation in their work processes. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
ISSN:7408188
DOI:10.1016/j.lisr.2022.101158