Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading
Two full-scale corner beam-column joints with and without fuse bars were designed, constructed, tested, analyzed and modeled under in-plane lateral cyclic loading presented herein. The first specimen was designed using Eurocode 8 and equipped with four fuse bars. Second specimen was designed using B...
Published in: | Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Marcílio Alves
2022
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85127797457&doi=10.1590%2f1679-78256581&partnerID=40&md5=2ac4566a8dcd7ff9070b901c02d1d92d |
id |
2-s2.0-85127797457 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85127797457 Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A. Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading 2022 Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures 19 1 10.1590/1679-78256581 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85127797457&doi=10.1590%2f1679-78256581&partnerID=40&md5=2ac4566a8dcd7ff9070b901c02d1d92d Two full-scale corner beam-column joints with and without fuse bars were designed, constructed, tested, analyzed and modeled under in-plane lateral cyclic loading presented herein. The first specimen was designed using Eurocode 8 and equipped with four fuse bars. Second specimen was designed using BS8110 (non-seismic code of practice) with corbel. All the specimens have similar size of foundation beams, columns and beams. Visual observation during testing showed that specimen with fuse bars suffered less damage as compare with specimen without fuse bars. Furthermore, specimen with fuse bars has higher lateral strength capacity, stiffness, ductility and equivalent viscous damping than specimen without fuse bars. Finally, there is good agreement of lateral strength capacity, ductility, stiffness and equivalent viscous damping which lies between 2% and 20% between experiment and modeling hysteresis loops. Thus, it is recommended that fuse bar as a green structural material can be installed inside the corner beam-column joint for RC buildings to cater strong earthquakes in high seismic regions. © 2021 Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. All rights reserved. Marcílio Alves 16797817 English Article All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
author |
Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A. |
spellingShingle |
Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A. Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading |
author_facet |
Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A. |
author_sort |
Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A. |
title |
Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading |
title_short |
Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading |
title_full |
Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading |
title_sort |
Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading |
publishDate |
2022 |
container_title |
Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures |
container_volume |
19 |
container_issue |
1 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1590/1679-78256581 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85127797457&doi=10.1590%2f1679-78256581&partnerID=40&md5=2ac4566a8dcd7ff9070b901c02d1d92d |
description |
Two full-scale corner beam-column joints with and without fuse bars were designed, constructed, tested, analyzed and modeled under in-plane lateral cyclic loading presented herein. The first specimen was designed using Eurocode 8 and equipped with four fuse bars. Second specimen was designed using BS8110 (non-seismic code of practice) with corbel. All the specimens have similar size of foundation beams, columns and beams. Visual observation during testing showed that specimen with fuse bars suffered less damage as compare with specimen without fuse bars. Furthermore, specimen with fuse bars has higher lateral strength capacity, stiffness, ductility and equivalent viscous damping than specimen without fuse bars. Finally, there is good agreement of lateral strength capacity, ductility, stiffness and equivalent viscous damping which lies between 2% and 20% between experiment and modeling hysteresis loops. Thus, it is recommended that fuse bar as a green structural material can be installed inside the corner beam-column joint for RC buildings to cater strong earthquakes in high seismic regions. © 2021 Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. All rights reserved. |
publisher |
Marcílio Alves |
issn |
16797817 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Gold Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1809678026374381568 |