Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading

Two full-scale corner beam-column joints with and without fuse bars were designed, constructed, tested, analyzed and modeled under in-plane lateral cyclic loading presented herein. The first specimen was designed using Eurocode 8 and equipped with four fuse bars. Second specimen was designed using B...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures
Main Author: Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Marcílio Alves 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85127797457&doi=10.1590%2f1679-78256581&partnerID=40&md5=2ac4566a8dcd7ff9070b901c02d1d92d
id 2-s2.0-85127797457
spelling 2-s2.0-85127797457
Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A.
Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading
2022
Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures
19
1
10.1590/1679-78256581
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85127797457&doi=10.1590%2f1679-78256581&partnerID=40&md5=2ac4566a8dcd7ff9070b901c02d1d92d
Two full-scale corner beam-column joints with and without fuse bars were designed, constructed, tested, analyzed and modeled under in-plane lateral cyclic loading presented herein. The first specimen was designed using Eurocode 8 and equipped with four fuse bars. Second specimen was designed using BS8110 (non-seismic code of practice) with corbel. All the specimens have similar size of foundation beams, columns and beams. Visual observation during testing showed that specimen with fuse bars suffered less damage as compare with specimen without fuse bars. Furthermore, specimen with fuse bars has higher lateral strength capacity, stiffness, ductility and equivalent viscous damping than specimen without fuse bars. Finally, there is good agreement of lateral strength capacity, ductility, stiffness and equivalent viscous damping which lies between 2% and 20% between experiment and modeling hysteresis loops. Thus, it is recommended that fuse bar as a green structural material can be installed inside the corner beam-column joint for RC buildings to cater strong earthquakes in high seismic regions. © 2021 Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. All rights reserved.
Marcílio Alves
16797817
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A.
spellingShingle Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A.
Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading
author_facet Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A.
author_sort Hadi N.D.; Hamid N.H.A.; Azmi I.F.; Hassan R.; Sutopo Y.; Chao B.; Zainuddin N.A.
title Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading
title_short Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading
title_full Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading
title_fullStr Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading
title_sort Comparison of Seismic Response Corner Beam-Column Joint with and without Fuse Bars Under In-Plane Lateral Cyclic Loading
publishDate 2022
container_title Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures
container_volume 19
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1590/1679-78256581
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85127797457&doi=10.1590%2f1679-78256581&partnerID=40&md5=2ac4566a8dcd7ff9070b901c02d1d92d
description Two full-scale corner beam-column joints with and without fuse bars were designed, constructed, tested, analyzed and modeled under in-plane lateral cyclic loading presented herein. The first specimen was designed using Eurocode 8 and equipped with four fuse bars. Second specimen was designed using BS8110 (non-seismic code of practice) with corbel. All the specimens have similar size of foundation beams, columns and beams. Visual observation during testing showed that specimen with fuse bars suffered less damage as compare with specimen without fuse bars. Furthermore, specimen with fuse bars has higher lateral strength capacity, stiffness, ductility and equivalent viscous damping than specimen without fuse bars. Finally, there is good agreement of lateral strength capacity, ductility, stiffness and equivalent viscous damping which lies between 2% and 20% between experiment and modeling hysteresis loops. Thus, it is recommended that fuse bar as a green structural material can be installed inside the corner beam-column joint for RC buildings to cater strong earthquakes in high seismic regions. © 2021 Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures. All rights reserved.
publisher Marcílio Alves
issn 16797817
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678026374381568