Non-pharmacological interventions for bone health after stroke: A systematic review

Objective To examine the effectiveness and safety of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce bone loss among post-stroke adult patients. Data sources Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Author: Sallehuddin H.; Ong T.; Said S.Md.; Tarmizi N.A.A.; Loh S.P.; Lim W.C.; Nadarajah R.; Lim H.T.; Zambri N.H.M.; Ho Y.Y.; Ghazali S.S.
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science 2022
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125154009&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0263935&partnerID=40&md5=a1e19a47c0f28ad522022ad2b787f12a
id 2-s2.0-85125154009
spelling 2-s2.0-85125154009
Sallehuddin H.; Ong T.; Said S.Md.; Tarmizi N.A.A.; Loh S.P.; Lim W.C.; Nadarajah R.; Lim H.T.; Zambri N.H.M.; Ho Y.Y.; Ghazali S.S.
Non-pharmacological interventions for bone health after stroke: A systematic review
2022
PLoS ONE
17
2-Feb
10.1371/journal.pone.0263935
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125154009&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0263935&partnerID=40&md5=a1e19a47c0f28ad522022ad2b787f12a
Objective To examine the effectiveness and safety of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce bone loss among post-stroke adult patients. Data sources Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed and PeDRO databases were searched from inception up to 31st August 2021. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials, experimental studies without randomization and prospective cohort studies with concurrent control of non-pharmacological interventions for adult stroke patients compared with placebo or other stroke care. The review outcomes were bone loss, fall and fracture. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools were used to assess methodological quality, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations Framework to assess outcome quality. Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) was used for result synthesis. Results Seven studies (n = 453) were included. The methodological and outcome qualities varied from low to moderate. There were statistically significant changes between the intervention and parallel/placebo group in bone mineral density, bone mineral content, cortical thickness and bone turnover markers with specific physical and vibration therapies (p<0.05). Falls were higher in the intervention group, but no fracture was reported. Conclusion There was low to moderate evidence that physical and vibration therapies significantly reduced bone loss in post-stroke patients at the expense of a higher falls rate. The sample size was small, and the interventions were highly heterogeneous with different duration, intensities and frequencies. Despite osteoporosis occurring with ageing and accelerated by stroke, there were no studies on vitamin D or protein supplementation to curb the ongoing loss. Effective, high-quality non-pharmacological intervention to improve post-stroke bone health is required. © 2022 Sallehuddin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Public Library of Science
19326203
English
Review
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Sallehuddin H.; Ong T.; Said S.Md.; Tarmizi N.A.A.; Loh S.P.; Lim W.C.; Nadarajah R.; Lim H.T.; Zambri N.H.M.; Ho Y.Y.; Ghazali S.S.
spellingShingle Sallehuddin H.; Ong T.; Said S.Md.; Tarmizi N.A.A.; Loh S.P.; Lim W.C.; Nadarajah R.; Lim H.T.; Zambri N.H.M.; Ho Y.Y.; Ghazali S.S.
Non-pharmacological interventions for bone health after stroke: A systematic review
author_facet Sallehuddin H.; Ong T.; Said S.Md.; Tarmizi N.A.A.; Loh S.P.; Lim W.C.; Nadarajah R.; Lim H.T.; Zambri N.H.M.; Ho Y.Y.; Ghazali S.S.
author_sort Sallehuddin H.; Ong T.; Said S.Md.; Tarmizi N.A.A.; Loh S.P.; Lim W.C.; Nadarajah R.; Lim H.T.; Zambri N.H.M.; Ho Y.Y.; Ghazali S.S.
title Non-pharmacological interventions for bone health after stroke: A systematic review
title_short Non-pharmacological interventions for bone health after stroke: A systematic review
title_full Non-pharmacological interventions for bone health after stroke: A systematic review
title_fullStr Non-pharmacological interventions for bone health after stroke: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Non-pharmacological interventions for bone health after stroke: A systematic review
title_sort Non-pharmacological interventions for bone health after stroke: A systematic review
publishDate 2022
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 17
container_issue 2-Feb
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0263935
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85125154009&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0263935&partnerID=40&md5=a1e19a47c0f28ad522022ad2b787f12a
description Objective To examine the effectiveness and safety of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce bone loss among post-stroke adult patients. Data sources Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ScienceDirect, Scopus, PubMed and PeDRO databases were searched from inception up to 31st August 2021. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials, experimental studies without randomization and prospective cohort studies with concurrent control of non-pharmacological interventions for adult stroke patients compared with placebo or other stroke care. The review outcomes were bone loss, fall and fracture. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tools were used to assess methodological quality, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations Framework to assess outcome quality. Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) was used for result synthesis. Results Seven studies (n = 453) were included. The methodological and outcome qualities varied from low to moderate. There were statistically significant changes between the intervention and parallel/placebo group in bone mineral density, bone mineral content, cortical thickness and bone turnover markers with specific physical and vibration therapies (p<0.05). Falls were higher in the intervention group, but no fracture was reported. Conclusion There was low to moderate evidence that physical and vibration therapies significantly reduced bone loss in post-stroke patients at the expense of a higher falls rate. The sample size was small, and the interventions were highly heterogeneous with different duration, intensities and frequencies. Despite osteoporosis occurring with ageing and accelerated by stroke, there were no studies on vitamin D or protein supplementation to curb the ongoing loss. Effective, high-quality non-pharmacological intervention to improve post-stroke bone health is required. © 2022 Sallehuddin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
publisher Public Library of Science
issn 19326203
language English
format Review
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678025510354944