Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Background. Infertility is an emerging health issue for men. Comparative efficacy of different pharmacological interventions on male infertility is not clear. The aim of this review is to investigate the efficacy of various pharmacological interventions among men with idiopathic male infertility. Al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Main Author: Shahid M.N.; Khan T.M.; Neoh C.F.; Lean Q.Y.; Bukhsh A.; Karuppannan M.
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85114367689&doi=10.3389%2ffphar.2021.638628&partnerID=40&md5=a756a0ea425ee2076379ebd6d3de27b0
id 2-s2.0-85114367689
spelling 2-s2.0-85114367689
Shahid M.N.; Khan T.M.; Neoh C.F.; Lean Q.Y.; Bukhsh A.; Karuppannan M.
Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
2021
Frontiers in Pharmacology
12

10.3389/fphar.2021.638628
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85114367689&doi=10.3389%2ffphar.2021.638628&partnerID=40&md5=a756a0ea425ee2076379ebd6d3de27b0
Background. Infertility is an emerging health issue for men. Comparative efficacy of different pharmacological interventions on male infertility is not clear. The aim of this review is to investigate the efficacy of various pharmacological interventions among men with idiopathic male infertility. All randomized control trials evaluating the effectuality of interventions on male infertility were included for network meta-analysis (NMA) from inception to 31 April 2020, systematically performed using STATA through the random effect model. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020152891). Results. The outcomes of interest were semen and hormonal parameters. Treatment effects (p < 0.05) were estimated through WMD at the confidence interval of 95%. Upon applying exclusion criteria, n=28 RCTs were found eligible for NMA. Results from NMA indicated that consumption of supplements increases sperm concentration levels [6.26, 95% CI 3.32, 9.21] in comparison to SERMs [4.97, 95% CI 1.61, 8.32], hormones [4.14, 95% CI 1.83, 6.46], and vitamins [0.15, 95% CI −20.86, 21.15)] with placebo, whereas the use of SERMs increased percentage sperm motility [6.69, 95% CI 2.38, 10.99] in comparison to supplements [6.46, 95% CI 2.57, 10.06], hormones [3.47, 95% CI 0.40, 6.54], and vitamins [−1.24, 95% CI −11.84, 9.43] with placebo. Consumption of hormones increased the sperm morphology [3.71, 95% CI, 1.34, 6.07] in contrast to supplements [2.22, 95% CI 0.12, 4.55], SERMs [2.21, 95% CI −0.78, 5.20], and vitamins [0.51, 95% CI −3.60, 4.62] with placebo. Supplements boosted the total testosterone levels [2.70, 95% CI 1.34, 4.07] in comparison to SERMs [1.83, 95% CI 1.16, 2.50], hormones [0.40, 95% CI −0.49, 1.29], and vitamins [−0.70, 95% CI −6.71, 5.31] with placebo. SERMs increase the serum FSH levels [3.63, 95% CI 1.48, 5.79] better than hormones [1.29, 95% CI −0.79, 3.36], vitamins [0.03, 95% CI −2.69, 2.76], and supplements [−4.45, 95% CI −7.15, −1.76] in comparison with placebo. Conclusion. This review establishes that all interventions had a significantly positive effect on male infertility. Statistically significant increased sperm parameters were noted in combinations of zinc sulfate (220 mg BID), clomiphene citrate (50 mg BID), and testosterone undecanoate and CoQ10; tamoxifen citrate and FSH were shown to improve the hormonal profile in infertile males. © Copyright © 2021 Shahid, Khan, Neoh, Lean, Bukhsh and Karuppannan.
Frontiers Media S.A.
16639812
English
Review
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Shahid M.N.; Khan T.M.; Neoh C.F.; Lean Q.Y.; Bukhsh A.; Karuppannan M.
spellingShingle Shahid M.N.; Khan T.M.; Neoh C.F.; Lean Q.Y.; Bukhsh A.; Karuppannan M.
Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
author_facet Shahid M.N.; Khan T.M.; Neoh C.F.; Lean Q.Y.; Bukhsh A.; Karuppannan M.
author_sort Shahid M.N.; Khan T.M.; Neoh C.F.; Lean Q.Y.; Bukhsh A.; Karuppannan M.
title Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_short Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
title_sort Effectiveness of Pharmacological Intervention Among Men with Infertility: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
publishDate 2021
container_title Frontiers in Pharmacology
container_volume 12
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.3389/fphar.2021.638628
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85114367689&doi=10.3389%2ffphar.2021.638628&partnerID=40&md5=a756a0ea425ee2076379ebd6d3de27b0
description Background. Infertility is an emerging health issue for men. Comparative efficacy of different pharmacological interventions on male infertility is not clear. The aim of this review is to investigate the efficacy of various pharmacological interventions among men with idiopathic male infertility. All randomized control trials evaluating the effectuality of interventions on male infertility were included for network meta-analysis (NMA) from inception to 31 April 2020, systematically performed using STATA through the random effect model. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020152891). Results. The outcomes of interest were semen and hormonal parameters. Treatment effects (p < 0.05) were estimated through WMD at the confidence interval of 95%. Upon applying exclusion criteria, n=28 RCTs were found eligible for NMA. Results from NMA indicated that consumption of supplements increases sperm concentration levels [6.26, 95% CI 3.32, 9.21] in comparison to SERMs [4.97, 95% CI 1.61, 8.32], hormones [4.14, 95% CI 1.83, 6.46], and vitamins [0.15, 95% CI −20.86, 21.15)] with placebo, whereas the use of SERMs increased percentage sperm motility [6.69, 95% CI 2.38, 10.99] in comparison to supplements [6.46, 95% CI 2.57, 10.06], hormones [3.47, 95% CI 0.40, 6.54], and vitamins [−1.24, 95% CI −11.84, 9.43] with placebo. Consumption of hormones increased the sperm morphology [3.71, 95% CI, 1.34, 6.07] in contrast to supplements [2.22, 95% CI 0.12, 4.55], SERMs [2.21, 95% CI −0.78, 5.20], and vitamins [0.51, 95% CI −3.60, 4.62] with placebo. Supplements boosted the total testosterone levels [2.70, 95% CI 1.34, 4.07] in comparison to SERMs [1.83, 95% CI 1.16, 2.50], hormones [0.40, 95% CI −0.49, 1.29], and vitamins [−0.70, 95% CI −6.71, 5.31] with placebo. SERMs increase the serum FSH levels [3.63, 95% CI 1.48, 5.79] better than hormones [1.29, 95% CI −0.79, 3.36], vitamins [0.03, 95% CI −2.69, 2.76], and supplements [−4.45, 95% CI −7.15, −1.76] in comparison with placebo. Conclusion. This review establishes that all interventions had a significantly positive effect on male infertility. Statistically significant increased sperm parameters were noted in combinations of zinc sulfate (220 mg BID), clomiphene citrate (50 mg BID), and testosterone undecanoate and CoQ10; tamoxifen citrate and FSH were shown to improve the hormonal profile in infertile males. © Copyright © 2021 Shahid, Khan, Neoh, Lean, Bukhsh and Karuppannan.
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
issn 16639812
language English
format Review
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678027424006144