Assessment of Photogrammetric Mapping Accuracy in Slope Area with Different Flight Altitude Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)

• Published in: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
• Main Author: Syafuan W.M.; Ismail N.; Idris A.N.; Isa N.A.; Zamili F.N.Z.; Jelani J.
• Format: Conference paper
• Language: English
• Published: IOP Publishing Ltd 2021
• Online Access: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85107210349&doi=10.1088%2f1755-1315%2f767%2f1%2f012037&partnerID=40&md5=cbd5fc0dac36db0b6e14f77d76a03d5f

Nowadays, UAV is preferred by experts since it is more affordable with reliable accuracy. However, debates on its accuracy draw worldwide attention in order to maintain the output's quality. Flight altitude is one of the most debated issues of UAV employment due to various ground conditions. Thus, this study intends to investigate the effects of flight altitude towards the final output accuracy. In this study, three different flight altitudes (60m, 80m and 100m) were used to test the outputs accuracy within selected sites in UPNM campus by employing DJI Phantom 4 Pro V2.0 drone. Orthophotos and Digital Surface Model (DSM) of the selected sites were then generated using Pix4D Mapper Software. On-screen measurements of selected features within the selected sites were taken and compared with the actual measurements obtained on grounds. Later, these outputs were used to generate contours using ArcGIS software. The generated contours were compared with available as-built plan. The results were examined qualitatively and quantitatively. From this study, it is found that the mean variance values on flat surface using different flight elevation were 0.86m, 0.99m and 1.16m for 60m, 80m and 100m respectively. Whereas, the mean variance values on hilly surface were 6.95m, 4.35m and 4.3m for 60m, 80m and 100m. On flat surfaces, 60m flight altitude was the best height to be used for UAV mapping. However, for hilly surfaces, 100m flight altitude was the best height to be used. This contrast may due to the lower overlapping images in 60m flight altitude image capture. From the study also, it is found that the accuracy of UAV mapping on hilly surfaces tends to be lower than flat surfaces. This called for further studies to identify the best measures to reduce the errors resulted by extreme ground characteristics. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.