Empirical Evidence of Managerial Attribution in Managing Poor-Performing Employees

The Attribution Model of Leadership explains internal and external attributions. However, actual data to explain the construct of internal and external attribution is scarce. This is because past researches use dependent measures already framed in terms of the internal/external categories. To overco...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics
Main Author: Mohamed S.; Ho J.A.
Format: Book chapter
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media B.V. 2021
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85101367387&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-65147-3_2&partnerID=40&md5=9f7608dbed77d222c242bfa5ac8231f7
id 2-s2.0-85101367387
spelling 2-s2.0-85101367387
Mohamed S.; Ho J.A.
Empirical Evidence of Managerial Attribution in Managing Poor-Performing Employees
2021
Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics
17

10.1007/978-3-030-65147-3_2
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85101367387&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-65147-3_2&partnerID=40&md5=9f7608dbed77d222c242bfa5ac8231f7
The Attribution Model of Leadership explains internal and external attributions. However, actual data to explain the construct of internal and external attribution is scarce. This is because past researches use dependent measures already framed in terms of the internal/external categories. To overcome this gap, this study explores the processes that construct internal and external attributions as experienced by human resource managers in managing poor-performing subordinates. Data of this study is based on an in-depth interview of six selected informants. The research finding explains the informants’ own words on the internal/external categories, based on their direct observation and knowledge structures for what specific causes covary with what specific effects. The contribution of this study is the empirical evidence, based on actual data that explains internal and external attribution. This is because the Attribution Model of Leadership is based on dependent measures of covariance analysis, while this research finding explains the processes based on specific explanation of internal and external attribution. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
23645067
English
Book chapter

author Mohamed S.; Ho J.A.
spellingShingle Mohamed S.; Ho J.A.
Empirical Evidence of Managerial Attribution in Managing Poor-Performing Employees
author_facet Mohamed S.; Ho J.A.
author_sort Mohamed S.; Ho J.A.
title Empirical Evidence of Managerial Attribution in Managing Poor-Performing Employees
title_short Empirical Evidence of Managerial Attribution in Managing Poor-Performing Employees
title_full Empirical Evidence of Managerial Attribution in Managing Poor-Performing Employees
title_fullStr Empirical Evidence of Managerial Attribution in Managing Poor-Performing Employees
title_full_unstemmed Empirical Evidence of Managerial Attribution in Managing Poor-Performing Employees
title_sort Empirical Evidence of Managerial Attribution in Managing Poor-Performing Employees
publishDate 2021
container_title Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics
container_volume 17
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1007/978-3-030-65147-3_2
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85101367387&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-030-65147-3_2&partnerID=40&md5=9f7608dbed77d222c242bfa5ac8231f7
description The Attribution Model of Leadership explains internal and external attributions. However, actual data to explain the construct of internal and external attribution is scarce. This is because past researches use dependent measures already framed in terms of the internal/external categories. To overcome this gap, this study explores the processes that construct internal and external attributions as experienced by human resource managers in managing poor-performing subordinates. Data of this study is based on an in-depth interview of six selected informants. The research finding explains the informants’ own words on the internal/external categories, based on their direct observation and knowledge structures for what specific causes covary with what specific effects. The contribution of this study is the empirical evidence, based on actual data that explains internal and external attribution. This is because the Attribution Model of Leadership is based on dependent measures of covariance analysis, while this research finding explains the processes based on specific explanation of internal and external attribution. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
publisher Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
issn 23645067
language English
format Book chapter
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678482018402304