Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching

Sketch and photo are from a different modality. Inter-modality matching approach requires right feature representation to represent both images so that the modality gap can be neglected. Improper feature selection may result in low recognition rate. There are many local descriptors have been propose...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics
Main Author: Setumin S.; Suandi S.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Inderscience Publishers 2020
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094909544&doi=10.1504%2fijcvr.2020.10031566&partnerID=40&md5=6f3ffd4f58200a293ee536476aec885d
id 2-s2.0-85094909544
spelling 2-s2.0-85094909544
Setumin S.; Suandi S.A.
Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching
2020
International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics
10
6
10.1504/ijcvr.2020.10031566
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094909544&doi=10.1504%2fijcvr.2020.10031566&partnerID=40&md5=6f3ffd4f58200a293ee536476aec885d
Sketch and photo are from a different modality. Inter-modality matching approach requires right feature representation to represent both images so that the modality gap can be neglected. Improper feature selection may result in low recognition rate. There are many local descriptors have been proposed in the literature, but it is unclear which descriptors are more appropriate for inter-modality matching. In this paper, we attempt to characterise local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching. Our evaluation for the characterisation uses cumulative match curve (CMC), and we compare seven different descriptors that are LBP, MLBP, HOG, PHOG, SIFT, SURF and DAISY. The evaluation focuses only on a viewed sketch. Based on the experiments, we observed that gradient-based descriptors gave higher accuracy as compared to the others. Out of five popular distance metrics evaluated, L1 gives a better result as compared to the other similarity distance measures. Copyright © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
Inderscience Publishers
17529131
English
Article

author Setumin S.; Suandi S.A.
spellingShingle Setumin S.; Suandi S.A.
Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching
author_facet Setumin S.; Suandi S.A.
author_sort Setumin S.; Suandi S.A.
title Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching
title_short Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching
title_full Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching
title_fullStr Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching
title_full_unstemmed Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching
title_sort Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching
publishDate 2020
container_title International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics
container_volume 10
container_issue 6
doi_str_mv 10.1504/ijcvr.2020.10031566
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094909544&doi=10.1504%2fijcvr.2020.10031566&partnerID=40&md5=6f3ffd4f58200a293ee536476aec885d
description Sketch and photo are from a different modality. Inter-modality matching approach requires right feature representation to represent both images so that the modality gap can be neglected. Improper feature selection may result in low recognition rate. There are many local descriptors have been proposed in the literature, but it is unclear which descriptors are more appropriate for inter-modality matching. In this paper, we attempt to characterise local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching. Our evaluation for the characterisation uses cumulative match curve (CMC), and we compare seven different descriptors that are LBP, MLBP, HOG, PHOG, SIFT, SURF and DAISY. The evaluation focuses only on a viewed sketch. Based on the experiments, we observed that gradient-based descriptors gave higher accuracy as compared to the others. Out of five popular distance metrics evaluated, L1 gives a better result as compared to the other similarity distance measures. Copyright © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.
publisher Inderscience Publishers
issn 17529131
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677599368019968