Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching
Sketch and photo are from a different modality. Inter-modality matching approach requires right feature representation to represent both images so that the modality gap can be neglected. Improper feature selection may result in low recognition rate. There are many local descriptors have been propose...
Published in: | International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Inderscience Publishers
2020
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094909544&doi=10.1504%2fijcvr.2020.10031566&partnerID=40&md5=6f3ffd4f58200a293ee536476aec885d |
id |
2-s2.0-85094909544 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85094909544 Setumin S.; Suandi S.A. Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching 2020 International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics 10 6 10.1504/ijcvr.2020.10031566 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094909544&doi=10.1504%2fijcvr.2020.10031566&partnerID=40&md5=6f3ffd4f58200a293ee536476aec885d Sketch and photo are from a different modality. Inter-modality matching approach requires right feature representation to represent both images so that the modality gap can be neglected. Improper feature selection may result in low recognition rate. There are many local descriptors have been proposed in the literature, but it is unclear which descriptors are more appropriate for inter-modality matching. In this paper, we attempt to characterise local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching. Our evaluation for the characterisation uses cumulative match curve (CMC), and we compare seven different descriptors that are LBP, MLBP, HOG, PHOG, SIFT, SURF and DAISY. The evaluation focuses only on a viewed sketch. Based on the experiments, we observed that gradient-based descriptors gave higher accuracy as compared to the others. Out of five popular distance metrics evaluated, L1 gives a better result as compared to the other similarity distance measures. Copyright © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. Inderscience Publishers 17529131 English Article |
author |
Setumin S.; Suandi S.A. |
spellingShingle |
Setumin S.; Suandi S.A. Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching |
author_facet |
Setumin S.; Suandi S.A. |
author_sort |
Setumin S.; Suandi S.A. |
title |
Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching |
title_short |
Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching |
title_full |
Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching |
title_fullStr |
Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching |
title_full_unstemmed |
Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching |
title_sort |
Characterising local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching |
publishDate |
2020 |
container_title |
International Journal of Computational Vision and Robotics |
container_volume |
10 |
container_issue |
6 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1504/ijcvr.2020.10031566 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094909544&doi=10.1504%2fijcvr.2020.10031566&partnerID=40&md5=6f3ffd4f58200a293ee536476aec885d |
description |
Sketch and photo are from a different modality. Inter-modality matching approach requires right feature representation to represent both images so that the modality gap can be neglected. Improper feature selection may result in low recognition rate. There are many local descriptors have been proposed in the literature, but it is unclear which descriptors are more appropriate for inter-modality matching. In this paper, we attempt to characterise local feature descriptors for face sketch to photo matching. Our evaluation for the characterisation uses cumulative match curve (CMC), and we compare seven different descriptors that are LBP, MLBP, HOG, PHOG, SIFT, SURF and DAISY. The evaluation focuses only on a viewed sketch. Based on the experiments, we observed that gradient-based descriptors gave higher accuracy as compared to the others. Out of five popular distance metrics evaluated, L1 gives a better result as compared to the other similarity distance measures. Copyright © 2020 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. |
publisher |
Inderscience Publishers |
issn |
17529131 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
|
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1809677599368019968 |