Structured vs unstructured debriefing: Finding the right approach in cabin crews' simulation-based resuscitation training

• Published in: ASM Science Journal
• Main Author: Fariduddin M.N.; Hum W.L.; Halim L.; Jaafar M.J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Akademi Sains Malaysia 2020
• Online Access: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089352609&doi=10.32802%2fASMSCJ.2020.530&partnerID=40&md5=ae5384f374d7e3083d322e144b504ba2

Simulation-based medical education consistently finds debriefing to be the most important element in providing effective learning. Yet, there are limited studies that demonstrate the outcomes of debriefing on simulation-based resuscitation learning in the non-medical community. This mixed-method study examined the effects of debriefing methods (DIAMOND vs Customary) in 2 simulation experiences on 130 cabin crews' resuscitation knowledge, technical & non-technical skills. The quality of debriefing was assessed using a survey followed by analysis through face interview. The findings showed that there was no significant effect on the usage of different debriefing method by both groups on the retention of all variables, F (3,123) =.540, p =.656, partial η2 =.013. The DIAMOND debriefing was showed to be more quality as perceived by the DASH-SV scores, t =-6.244, df = 98, p = <.001. Elements such as Cognitive, Methodology & Psychosocial were reported to promote the retention of knowledge and skills among the participants. Despite not generating a statistically significant difference, this study reports important information about the influence of structured debriefing with additional investigations conducted with improved designs are needed to provide further evidence and perceptual effectiveness of structured debriefing. © 2020 Akademi Sains Malaysia.