Affirmative Solutions on Local Antimagic Chromatic Number

An edge labeling of a connected graph G= (V, E) is said to be local antimagic if it is a bijection f: E→ { 1 , … , | E| } such that for any pair of adjacent vertices x and y, f+(x) ≠ f+(y) , where the induced vertex label f+(x) = ∑ f(e) , with e ranging over all the edges incident to x. The local an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Graphs and Combinatorics
Main Author: Lau G.-C.; Ng H.-K.; Shiu W.-C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer 2020
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85086567268&doi=10.1007%2fs00373-020-02197-2&partnerID=40&md5=5af16c465252b801bb69976d8256f94d
Description
Summary:An edge labeling of a connected graph G= (V, E) is said to be local antimagic if it is a bijection f: E→ { 1 , … , | E| } such that for any pair of adjacent vertices x and y, f+(x) ≠ f+(y) , where the induced vertex label f+(x) = ∑ f(e) , with e ranging over all the edges incident to x. The local antimagic chromatic number of G, denoted by χla(G) , is the minimum number of distinct induced vertex labels over all local antimagic labelings of G. In this paper, we give counterexamples to the lower bound of χla(G∨ O2) that was obtained in [Local antimagic vertex coloring of a graph, Graphs Combin. 33:275–285 (2017)]. A sharp lower bound of χla(G∨ On) and sufficient conditions for the given lower bound to be attained are obtained. Moreover, we settled Theorem 2.15 and solved Problem 3.3 in the affirmative. We also completely determined the local antimagic chromatic number of complete bipartite graphs. © 2020, Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature.
ISSN:9110119
DOI:10.1007/s00373-020-02197-2