PM2.5 and ozone in office environments and their potential impact on human health

• Published in: Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
• Main Author: Othman M.; Latif M.T.; Yee C.Z.; Norshariffudin L.K.; Azhari A.; Halim N.D.A.; Alias A.; Sofwan N.M.; Hamid H.H.A.; Matsumi Y.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Academic Press 2020
• Online Access: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85081018191&doi=10.1016%2fj.ecoenv.2020.110432&partnerID=40&md5=48ae201f739c013833bc3a7708e2bd70

It is important to have good indoor air quality, especially in indoor office environments, in order to enhance productivity and maintain good work performance. This study investigated the effects of indoor office activities on particulate matter of less than 2.5 μm (PM2.5) and ozone (O3) concentrations, assessing their potential impact on human health. Measurements of indoor PM2.5 and O3 concentrations were taken every 24 h during the working days in five office environments located in a semi-urban area. As a comparison, the outdoor concentrations were derived from the nearest Continuous Air Quality Monitoring Station. The results showed that the average 24 h of indoor and outdoor PM2.5 concentrations were 3.24 ± 0.82 μg m−3 and 17.4 ± 3.58 μg m−3 respectively, while for O3 they were 4.75 ± 4.52 ppb and 21.5 ± 5.22 ppb respectively. During working hours, the range of PM2.5 concentrations were 1.00 μg m−3 to 6.10 μg m−3 while for O3 they were 0.10 ppb to 38.0 ppb. The indoor to outdoor ratio (I/O) for PM2.5 and O3 was <1, thus indicating a low infiltration of outdoor sources. The value of the hazard quotient (HQ) for all sampling buildings was <1 for both chronic and acute exposures, indicating that the non-carcinogenic risks are negligible. Higher total cancer risk (CR) value for outdoors (2.67E-03) was observed compared to indoors (4.95E-04) under chronic exposure while the CR value for acute exposure exceeded 1.0E-04, thus suggesting a carcinogenic PM2.5 risk for both the indoor and outdoor environments. The results of this study suggest that office activities, such as printing and photocopying, affect indoor O3 concentrations while PM2.5 concentrations are impacted by indoor-related contributions. © 2020 Elsevier Inc.