Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries

This paper aims to investigate the extent of anti-corruption reporting by ASEAN companies and examine whether coercive factors influence the level of disclosure. The authors adopt indicators from the Global Reporting Initiative version 4.0 to measure the extent of anti-corruption disclosures in 117...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Business Ethics
Main Author: Sari T.K.; Cahaya F.R.; Joseph C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media B.V. 2021
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079144049&doi=10.1007%2fs10551-020-04452-1&partnerID=40&md5=40fbfecb783850f166641bef443ab4e5
id 2-s2.0-85079144049
spelling 2-s2.0-85079144049
Sari T.K.; Cahaya F.R.; Joseph C.
Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries
2021
Journal of Business Ethics
171
3
10.1007/s10551-020-04452-1
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079144049&doi=10.1007%2fs10551-020-04452-1&partnerID=40&md5=40fbfecb783850f166641bef443ab4e5
This paper aims to investigate the extent of anti-corruption reporting by ASEAN companies and examine whether coercive factors influence the level of disclosure. The authors adopt indicators from the Global Reporting Initiative version 4.0 to measure the extent of anti-corruption disclosures in 117 companies’ reports. Informed by a coercive isomorphism tenet drawn from the institutional theory, the authors propose that several institutional factors influence the extent of their voluntary disclosures. The findings reveal that a large degree of variability difference between the average levels of anti-corruption disclosure in Thailand (434 words) and the Philippines (149 words). The dependence on government tenders and foreign ownership are associated with the level of disclosure. Surprisingly, the United Nation Global Compact membership is not a significant determinant of anti-corruption reporting. This signifies that the membership in the international initiative does not correspond to individual company’s commitment to disclose anti-corruption information. In spite of significant efforts undertaken by global organizations to combat corruption, the level of anti-corruption disclosure is significantly different among the four countries under study. The disclosure of sensitive information such as the confirmed incidences of corruption cases requires careful consideration by the top management as it is subjected to legal implications and reputational risks. Thus, impression management can complement the coercive pressure in explaining the level of anti-corruption reporting. This study is among the first studies which explores the association between coercive factors and the level of anti-corruption disclosure in ASEAN region. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
1674544
English
Article

author Sari T.K.; Cahaya F.R.; Joseph C.
spellingShingle Sari T.K.; Cahaya F.R.; Joseph C.
Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries
author_facet Sari T.K.; Cahaya F.R.; Joseph C.
author_sort Sari T.K.; Cahaya F.R.; Joseph C.
title Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries
title_short Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries
title_full Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries
title_fullStr Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries
title_full_unstemmed Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries
title_sort Coercive Pressures and Anti-corruption Reporting: The Case of ASEAN Countries
publishDate 2021
container_title Journal of Business Ethics
container_volume 171
container_issue 3
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10551-020-04452-1
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079144049&doi=10.1007%2fs10551-020-04452-1&partnerID=40&md5=40fbfecb783850f166641bef443ab4e5
description This paper aims to investigate the extent of anti-corruption reporting by ASEAN companies and examine whether coercive factors influence the level of disclosure. The authors adopt indicators from the Global Reporting Initiative version 4.0 to measure the extent of anti-corruption disclosures in 117 companies’ reports. Informed by a coercive isomorphism tenet drawn from the institutional theory, the authors propose that several institutional factors influence the extent of their voluntary disclosures. The findings reveal that a large degree of variability difference between the average levels of anti-corruption disclosure in Thailand (434 words) and the Philippines (149 words). The dependence on government tenders and foreign ownership are associated with the level of disclosure. Surprisingly, the United Nation Global Compact membership is not a significant determinant of anti-corruption reporting. This signifies that the membership in the international initiative does not correspond to individual company’s commitment to disclose anti-corruption information. In spite of significant efforts undertaken by global organizations to combat corruption, the level of anti-corruption disclosure is significantly different among the four countries under study. The disclosure of sensitive information such as the confirmed incidences of corruption cases requires careful consideration by the top management as it is subjected to legal implications and reputational risks. Thus, impression management can complement the coercive pressure in explaining the level of anti-corruption reporting. This study is among the first studies which explores the association between coercive factors and the level of anti-corruption disclosure in ASEAN region. © 2020, Springer Nature B.V.
publisher Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
issn 1674544
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678027358994432