Quality Monitoring Of The Accounting Profession: Are We Ready For Peer Review?

One of the main concerns of the accounting profession is to provide consistently high quality services. In line with this objective, the current study was conducted for three main purposes: to determine the level of internal quality control and documentation amongst public accounting practices in Ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting
Main Author: Haji Omar N.; Johari Alwi M.; Ahmad Z.
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2003
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85072122501&doi=10.1108%2f19852510380000667&partnerID=40&md5=81fcc4e42ac254758f532fcc8ee48d34
id 2-s2.0-85072122501
spelling 2-s2.0-85072122501
Haji Omar N.; Johari Alwi M.; Ahmad Z.
Quality Monitoring Of The Accounting Profession: Are We Ready For Peer Review?
2003
Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting
1
1
10.1108/19852510380000667
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85072122501&doi=10.1108%2f19852510380000667&partnerID=40&md5=81fcc4e42ac254758f532fcc8ee48d34
One of the main concerns of the accounting profession is to provide consistently high quality services. In line with this objective, the current study was conducted for three main purposes: to determine the level of internal quality control and documentation amongst public accounting practices in Malaysia; to examine the role of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA) in ensuring members’ compliance to the International Standards of Auditing (AI) on Internal quality and documentation, and to explore the potential of using peer review as a tool for monitoring the quality of public practices in Malaysia. The findings implied that the practitioners have satisfactorily adopted quality control policies and procedures as required by the International Auditing Standards. In addition, the public accounting firms were also found to have placed significant attention to the form and content of documentation as stipulated by the AIs. The potential of using peer review as a quality‐monitoring tool has strong support amongst the locally established public practices. © 2003, MCB UP Limited.
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
19852517
English
Review

author Haji Omar N.; Johari Alwi M.; Ahmad Z.
spellingShingle Haji Omar N.; Johari Alwi M.; Ahmad Z.
Quality Monitoring Of The Accounting Profession: Are We Ready For Peer Review?
author_facet Haji Omar N.; Johari Alwi M.; Ahmad Z.
author_sort Haji Omar N.; Johari Alwi M.; Ahmad Z.
title Quality Monitoring Of The Accounting Profession: Are We Ready For Peer Review?
title_short Quality Monitoring Of The Accounting Profession: Are We Ready For Peer Review?
title_full Quality Monitoring Of The Accounting Profession: Are We Ready For Peer Review?
title_fullStr Quality Monitoring Of The Accounting Profession: Are We Ready For Peer Review?
title_full_unstemmed Quality Monitoring Of The Accounting Profession: Are We Ready For Peer Review?
title_sort Quality Monitoring Of The Accounting Profession: Are We Ready For Peer Review?
publishDate 2003
container_title Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting
container_volume 1
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1108/19852510380000667
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85072122501&doi=10.1108%2f19852510380000667&partnerID=40&md5=81fcc4e42ac254758f532fcc8ee48d34
description One of the main concerns of the accounting profession is to provide consistently high quality services. In line with this objective, the current study was conducted for three main purposes: to determine the level of internal quality control and documentation amongst public accounting practices in Malaysia; to examine the role of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (MIA) in ensuring members’ compliance to the International Standards of Auditing (AI) on Internal quality and documentation, and to explore the potential of using peer review as a tool for monitoring the quality of public practices in Malaysia. The findings implied that the practitioners have satisfactorily adopted quality control policies and procedures as required by the International Auditing Standards. In addition, the public accounting firms were also found to have placed significant attention to the form and content of documentation as stipulated by the AIs. The potential of using peer review as a quality‐monitoring tool has strong support amongst the locally established public practices. © 2003, MCB UP Limited.
publisher Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
issn 19852517
language English
format Review
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678162130370560