Synchrotron microbeam radiotherapy evokes a different early tumor immunomodulatory response to conventional radiotherapy in EMT6.5 mammary tumors

Background: Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a new, evolving form of radiotherapy that has potential for clinical application. Several studies have shown in preclinical models that synchrotron MRT achieves equivalent tumor control to conventional radiotherapy (CRT) but with significa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiotherapy and Oncology
Main Author: Yang Y.; Swierczak A.; Ibahim M.; Paiva P.; Cann L.; Stevenson A.W.; Crosbie J.C.; Anderson R.L.; Rogers P.A.W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ireland Ltd 2019
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85060246825&doi=10.1016%2fj.radonc.2019.01.006&partnerID=40&md5=3c029f14cbd1717791f70269f16f6309
Description
Summary:Background: Synchrotron microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) is a new, evolving form of radiotherapy that has potential for clinical application. Several studies have shown in preclinical models that synchrotron MRT achieves equivalent tumor control to conventional radiotherapy (CRT) but with significantly reduced normal tissue damage. Methods: To explore differences between these two modalities, we assessed the immune cell infiltrate into EMT6.5 mammary tumors after CRT and MRT. Results: CRT induced marked increases in tumor-associated macrophages and neutrophils while there were no increases in these populations following MRT. In contrast, there were higher numbers of T cells in the MRT treated tumors. There were also increased levels of CCL2 by immunohistochemistry in tumors subjected to CRT, but not to MRT. Conversely, we found that MRT induced higher levels of pro-inflammatory genes in tumors than CRT. Conclusion: Our data are the first to demonstrate substantial differences in macrophage, neutrophil and T cell numbers in tumors following MRT versus CRT, providing support for the concept that MRT evokes a different immunomodulatory response in tumors compared to CRT. © 2019
ISSN:1678140
DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.006