An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system

To date, there exists a variety of prediction approaches have been used in recommender systems. Among the widely known approaches are Content Based Filtering (CBF) and Collaborative Filtering (CF). Based on literatures, CF with users rating element has been widely used but the approach faced two com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE)
Main Author: Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Science Publishing Corporation Inc 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059241669&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.33.23472&partnerID=40&md5=e1b9753e4bbcfc9f09b32bb9a6d2644a
id 2-s2.0-85059241669
spelling 2-s2.0-85059241669
Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A.
An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system
2018
International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE)
7
4
10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23472
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059241669&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.33.23472&partnerID=40&md5=e1b9753e4bbcfc9f09b32bb9a6d2644a
To date, there exists a variety of prediction approaches have been used in recommender systems. Among the widely known approaches are Content Based Filtering (CBF) and Collaborative Filtering (CF). Based on literatures, CF with users rating element has been widely used but the approach faced two common problems namely cold start and sparsity. As an alternative, Trust Aware Recommender Systems (TARS) for the CF based users rating has been introduced. The research progress on TARS improvement is found to be rapidly progressing but lacking in the algorithm evaluation has been started to appear. Many researchers that introduced their new TARS approach provides different evaluation of users' views for the TARS performances. As a result, the performances of different TARS from different publications are not comparable and difficult to be analyzed. Therefore, this paper is written with objective to provide common group of the users' views based on trusted users in TARS. Then, this paper demonstrates a comparison study between different TARS techniques with the identified common groups by means of the accuracy error, rating and users coverage. The results therefore provide a relative comparison between different TARS. © 2018 Authors.
Science Publishing Corporation Inc
2227524X
English
Article
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
author Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A.
spellingShingle Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A.
An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system
author_facet Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A.
author_sort Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A.
title An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system
title_short An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system
title_full An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system
title_fullStr An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system
title_sort An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system
publishDate 2018
container_title International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE)
container_volume 7
container_issue 4
doi_str_mv 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23472
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059241669&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.33.23472&partnerID=40&md5=e1b9753e4bbcfc9f09b32bb9a6d2644a
description To date, there exists a variety of prediction approaches have been used in recommender systems. Among the widely known approaches are Content Based Filtering (CBF) and Collaborative Filtering (CF). Based on literatures, CF with users rating element has been widely used but the approach faced two common problems namely cold start and sparsity. As an alternative, Trust Aware Recommender Systems (TARS) for the CF based users rating has been introduced. The research progress on TARS improvement is found to be rapidly progressing but lacking in the algorithm evaluation has been started to appear. Many researchers that introduced their new TARS approach provides different evaluation of users' views for the TARS performances. As a result, the performances of different TARS from different publications are not comparable and difficult to be analyzed. Therefore, this paper is written with objective to provide common group of the users' views based on trusted users in TARS. Then, this paper demonstrates a comparison study between different TARS techniques with the identified common groups by means of the accuracy error, rating and users coverage. The results therefore provide a relative comparison between different TARS. © 2018 Authors.
publisher Science Publishing Corporation Inc
issn 2227524X
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871800824004608