An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system
To date, there exists a variety of prediction approaches have been used in recommender systems. Among the widely known approaches are Content Based Filtering (CBF) and Collaborative Filtering (CF). Based on literatures, CF with users rating element has been widely used but the approach faced two com...
Published in: | International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE) |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Science Publishing Corporation Inc
2018
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059241669&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.33.23472&partnerID=40&md5=e1b9753e4bbcfc9f09b32bb9a6d2644a |
id |
2-s2.0-85059241669 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-85059241669 Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A. An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system 2018 International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE) 7 4 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23472 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059241669&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.33.23472&partnerID=40&md5=e1b9753e4bbcfc9f09b32bb9a6d2644a To date, there exists a variety of prediction approaches have been used in recommender systems. Among the widely known approaches are Content Based Filtering (CBF) and Collaborative Filtering (CF). Based on literatures, CF with users rating element has been widely used but the approach faced two common problems namely cold start and sparsity. As an alternative, Trust Aware Recommender Systems (TARS) for the CF based users rating has been introduced. The research progress on TARS improvement is found to be rapidly progressing but lacking in the algorithm evaluation has been started to appear. Many researchers that introduced their new TARS approach provides different evaluation of users' views for the TARS performances. As a result, the performances of different TARS from different publications are not comparable and difficult to be analyzed. Therefore, this paper is written with objective to provide common group of the users' views based on trusted users in TARS. Then, this paper demonstrates a comparison study between different TARS techniques with the identified common groups by means of the accuracy error, rating and users coverage. The results therefore provide a relative comparison between different TARS. © 2018 Authors. Science Publishing Corporation Inc 2227524X English Article All Open Access; Bronze Open Access |
author |
Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A. |
spellingShingle |
Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A. An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system |
author_facet |
Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A. |
author_sort |
Masrom S.; Khairuddin N.; Abdul Rahman A.; Azizan A.; Rahman A.S.A. |
title |
An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system |
title_short |
An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system |
title_full |
An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system |
title_fullStr |
An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system |
title_full_unstemmed |
An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system |
title_sort |
An evaluation framework of trust aware recommender system |
publishDate |
2018 |
container_title |
International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE) |
container_volume |
7 |
container_issue |
4 |
doi_str_mv |
10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23472 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059241669&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.33.23472&partnerID=40&md5=e1b9753e4bbcfc9f09b32bb9a6d2644a |
description |
To date, there exists a variety of prediction approaches have been used in recommender systems. Among the widely known approaches are Content Based Filtering (CBF) and Collaborative Filtering (CF). Based on literatures, CF with users rating element has been widely used but the approach faced two common problems namely cold start and sparsity. As an alternative, Trust Aware Recommender Systems (TARS) for the CF based users rating has been introduced. The research progress on TARS improvement is found to be rapidly progressing but lacking in the algorithm evaluation has been started to appear. Many researchers that introduced their new TARS approach provides different evaluation of users' views for the TARS performances. As a result, the performances of different TARS from different publications are not comparable and difficult to be analyzed. Therefore, this paper is written with objective to provide common group of the users' views based on trusted users in TARS. Then, this paper demonstrates a comparison study between different TARS techniques with the identified common groups by means of the accuracy error, rating and users coverage. The results therefore provide a relative comparison between different TARS. © 2018 Authors. |
publisher |
Science Publishing Corporation Inc |
issn |
2227524X |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1812871800824004608 |