Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using rasch model

Evaluation of the questions' level of complexity for the statistical course was proposed using the revised version of Bloom's taxonomy. The use of Bloom's taxonomy in statistical examination papers allows the degree of difficulty to be pseudo-objectively assessed. Well-constructed que...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE)
Main Author: Zulkifli F.; Abidin R.Z.; Razi N.F.M.; Mohammad N.H.; Ahmad R.; Azmi A.Z.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Science Publishing Corporation Inc 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059234320&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.33.23479&partnerID=40&md5=35f301c767ada27a4a4c4ca4d8260358
id 2-s2.0-85059234320
spelling 2-s2.0-85059234320
Zulkifli F.; Abidin R.Z.; Razi N.F.M.; Mohammad N.H.; Ahmad R.; Azmi A.Z.
Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using rasch model
2018
International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE)
7
4
10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23479
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059234320&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.33.23479&partnerID=40&md5=35f301c767ada27a4a4c4ca4d8260358
Evaluation of the questions' level of complexity for the statistical course was proposed using the revised version of Bloom's taxonomy. The use of Bloom's taxonomy in statistical examination papers allows the degree of difficulty to be pseudo-objectively assessed. Well-constructed questions in the final examination will help in measuring students' abilities based on comprehensive cognitive skills. Therefore, this study used Rasch Model to evaluate the quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course. According to research findings, five out of 30 questions are considered as misfit items. It is therefore recommended that these items be removed or rephrased to better suit the students' ability level in a course. Whereas, nine questions have significant differences between taxonomy level and Rasch level that require further analysis. Overall, students view the set of exam questions as simple due to the unavailability of difficult items. Based on this result, it is suggested that the exam questions should undergo verification process from the expert and students should be exposed early to various types of questions with different level of difficulty. © 2018 Authors.
Science Publishing Corporation Inc
2227524X
English
Article
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
author Zulkifli F.; Abidin R.Z.; Razi N.F.M.; Mohammad N.H.; Ahmad R.; Azmi A.Z.
spellingShingle Zulkifli F.; Abidin R.Z.; Razi N.F.M.; Mohammad N.H.; Ahmad R.; Azmi A.Z.
Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using rasch model
author_facet Zulkifli F.; Abidin R.Z.; Razi N.F.M.; Mohammad N.H.; Ahmad R.; Azmi A.Z.
author_sort Zulkifli F.; Abidin R.Z.; Razi N.F.M.; Mohammad N.H.; Ahmad R.; Azmi A.Z.
title Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using rasch model
title_short Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using rasch model
title_full Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using rasch model
title_fullStr Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using rasch model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using rasch model
title_sort Evaluating quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course using rasch model
publishDate 2018
container_title International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE)
container_volume 7
container_issue 4
doi_str_mv 10.14419/ijet.v7i4.33.23479
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85059234320&doi=10.14419%2fijet.v7i4.33.23479&partnerID=40&md5=35f301c767ada27a4a4c4ca4d8260358
description Evaluation of the questions' level of complexity for the statistical course was proposed using the revised version of Bloom's taxonomy. The use of Bloom's taxonomy in statistical examination papers allows the degree of difficulty to be pseudo-objectively assessed. Well-constructed questions in the final examination will help in measuring students' abilities based on comprehensive cognitive skills. Therefore, this study used Rasch Model to evaluate the quality and reliability of final exam questions for probability and statistics course. According to research findings, five out of 30 questions are considered as misfit items. It is therefore recommended that these items be removed or rephrased to better suit the students' ability level in a course. Whereas, nine questions have significant differences between taxonomy level and Rasch level that require further analysis. Overall, students view the set of exam questions as simple due to the unavailability of difficult items. Based on this result, it is suggested that the exam questions should undergo verification process from the expert and students should be exposed early to various types of questions with different level of difficulty. © 2018 Authors.
publisher Science Publishing Corporation Inc
issn 2227524X
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678483294519296