Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model

Watershed characteristics, such as hydraulic length, total area, total river length and perimeter, can be obtained from an analysis of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). There are many sources of DEM. In this study, DEM were obtained from two different sources, i.e. Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan Malaysia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:AIP Conference Proceedings
Main Author: Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M.
Format: Conference paper
Language:English
Published: American Institute of Physics Inc. 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055593362&doi=10.1063%2f1.5062710&partnerID=40&md5=c5f45e03abf1048cf28db27d9b30f867
id 2-s2.0-85055593362
spelling 2-s2.0-85055593362
Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M.
Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model
2018
AIP Conference Proceedings
2020

10.1063/1.5062710
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055593362&doi=10.1063%2f1.5062710&partnerID=40&md5=c5f45e03abf1048cf28db27d9b30f867
Watershed characteristics, such as hydraulic length, total area, total river length and perimeter, can be obtained from an analysis of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). There are many sources of DEM. In this study, DEM were obtained from two different sources, i.e. Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan Malaysia (JUPEM) and Google Earth (GE). The attributes examined in this study include the shape and area of a watershed (km2), total river length (km) and hydraulic length (km) of the river using a Geographical Information System (GIS) software. The data from JUPEM was used as the benchmark. It was found that the extracted DEM from GE showed encouraging results. The hydraulic length of the rivers reached very good argument, with only a 3% difference when compared to JUPEM. Additionally, the shape of watershed from GE was slightly smaller than JUPEM, with a difference of about 17%. This study concludes that the DEM from GE can be used as an alternative source of DEM data, especially for studies related to hydrology. © 2018 Author(s).
American Institute of Physics Inc.
0094243X
English
Conference paper

author Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M.
spellingShingle Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M.
Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model
author_facet Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M.
author_sort Abdullah J.; Muhammad N.S.; Osman S.Z.M.
title Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model
title_short Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model
title_full Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model
title_fullStr Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model
title_full_unstemmed Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model
title_sort Analyses of watershed characteristics based on different sources of digital elevation model
publishDate 2018
container_title AIP Conference Proceedings
container_volume 2020
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1063/1.5062710
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85055593362&doi=10.1063%2f1.5062710&partnerID=40&md5=c5f45e03abf1048cf28db27d9b30f867
description Watershed characteristics, such as hydraulic length, total area, total river length and perimeter, can be obtained from an analysis of a Digital Elevation Model (DEM). There are many sources of DEM. In this study, DEM were obtained from two different sources, i.e. Jabatan Ukur dan Pemetaan Malaysia (JUPEM) and Google Earth (GE). The attributes examined in this study include the shape and area of a watershed (km2), total river length (km) and hydraulic length (km) of the river using a Geographical Information System (GIS) software. The data from JUPEM was used as the benchmark. It was found that the extracted DEM from GE showed encouraging results. The hydraulic length of the rivers reached very good argument, with only a 3% difference when compared to JUPEM. Additionally, the shape of watershed from GE was slightly smaller than JUPEM, with a difference of about 17%. This study concludes that the DEM from GE can be used as an alternative source of DEM data, especially for studies related to hydrology. © 2018 Author(s).
publisher American Institute of Physics Inc.
issn 0094243X
language English
format Conference paper
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1825722584962957312