Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey

Micafungin was reported to be non-inferior to liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) in treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC). The current study aimed to evaluate the economic impact of using micafungin versus LAmB for treatment of candidaemia and IC in Turkey. A decision analyti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Main Author: Neoh C.F.; Senol E.; Kara A.; Dinleyici E.C.; Turner S.J.; Kong D.C.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Verlag 2018
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049144871&doi=10.1007%2fs10096-018-3312-9&partnerID=40&md5=81f64e080624db11c3deb824749b6315
id 2-s2.0-85049144871
spelling 2-s2.0-85049144871
Neoh C.F.; Senol E.; Kara A.; Dinleyici E.C.; Turner S.J.; Kong D.C.M.
Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey
2018
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
37
9
10.1007/s10096-018-3312-9
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049144871&doi=10.1007%2fs10096-018-3312-9&partnerID=40&md5=81f64e080624db11c3deb824749b6315
Micafungin was reported to be non-inferior to liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) in treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC). The current study aimed to evaluate the economic impact of using micafungin versus LAmB for treatment of candidaemia and IC in Turkey. A decision analytic model, which depicted economic consequences upon administration of micafungin or LAmB for treating patients with candidaemia and IC in the Turkish hospitals, was constructed. Patients were switched to an alternative antifungal agent if initial treatment failed due to mycological persistence. All patients were followed up until treatment success or death. Outcome probabilities were obtained from published literature and cost inputs were derived from the latest Turkish resources. Expert panels were used to estimate data that were not available in the literature. Cost per patient treated for each intervention was then calculated. Sensitivity analyses including Monte Carlo simulation were performed. For treatment of candidaemia and IC, micafungin (€4809) was associated with higher total cost than LAmB (€4467), with an additional cost of €341 per treated patient. Cost of initial antifungal treatment was the major cost driver for both comparators. The model outcome was robust over a wide variation in input variables except for drug acquisition cost and duration of initial antifungal treatment with micafungin or LAmB. LAmB is cost-saving relative to micafungin for the treatment of candidaemia and IC from the Turkish hospital perspective, with variation in drug acquisition cost of the critical factor affecting the model outcome. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Springer Verlag
9349723
English
Article

author Neoh C.F.; Senol E.; Kara A.; Dinleyici E.C.; Turner S.J.; Kong D.C.M.
spellingShingle Neoh C.F.; Senol E.; Kara A.; Dinleyici E.C.; Turner S.J.; Kong D.C.M.
Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey
author_facet Neoh C.F.; Senol E.; Kara A.; Dinleyici E.C.; Turner S.J.; Kong D.C.M.
author_sort Neoh C.F.; Senol E.; Kara A.; Dinleyici E.C.; Turner S.J.; Kong D.C.M.
title Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey
title_short Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey
title_full Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey
title_sort Economic evaluation of micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) for treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC) in Turkey
publishDate 2018
container_title European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
container_volume 37
container_issue 9
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10096-018-3312-9
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85049144871&doi=10.1007%2fs10096-018-3312-9&partnerID=40&md5=81f64e080624db11c3deb824749b6315
description Micafungin was reported to be non-inferior to liposomal amphotericin B (LAmB) in treating patients with candidaemia and invasive candidiasis (IC). The current study aimed to evaluate the economic impact of using micafungin versus LAmB for treatment of candidaemia and IC in Turkey. A decision analytic model, which depicted economic consequences upon administration of micafungin or LAmB for treating patients with candidaemia and IC in the Turkish hospitals, was constructed. Patients were switched to an alternative antifungal agent if initial treatment failed due to mycological persistence. All patients were followed up until treatment success or death. Outcome probabilities were obtained from published literature and cost inputs were derived from the latest Turkish resources. Expert panels were used to estimate data that were not available in the literature. Cost per patient treated for each intervention was then calculated. Sensitivity analyses including Monte Carlo simulation were performed. For treatment of candidaemia and IC, micafungin (€4809) was associated with higher total cost than LAmB (€4467), with an additional cost of €341 per treated patient. Cost of initial antifungal treatment was the major cost driver for both comparators. The model outcome was robust over a wide variation in input variables except for drug acquisition cost and duration of initial antifungal treatment with micafungin or LAmB. LAmB is cost-saving relative to micafungin for the treatment of candidaemia and IC from the Turkish hospital perspective, with variation in drug acquisition cost of the critical factor affecting the model outcome. © 2018, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
publisher Springer Verlag
issn 9349723
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1818940561535533056