Economic growth and convergence: Do institutional proximity and spillovers matter?

This paper extends the existing studies on institutions-growth nexus in two ways: firstly, it estimates a growth model that is spatially augmented to capture the countries’ dependence, and secondly it measures the countries’ dependence using a newly proposed concept called institutional proximity, i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Policy Modeling
Main Author: Ahmad M.; Hall S.G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85026645806&doi=10.1016%2fj.jpolmod.2017.07.001&partnerID=40&md5=10bd2ba0d550b8d9624988107db32dea
id 2-s2.0-85026645806
spelling 2-s2.0-85026645806
Ahmad M.; Hall S.G.
Economic growth and convergence: Do institutional proximity and spillovers matter?
2017
Journal of Policy Modeling
39
6
10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.07.001
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85026645806&doi=10.1016%2fj.jpolmod.2017.07.001&partnerID=40&md5=10bd2ba0d550b8d9624988107db32dea
This paper extends the existing studies on institutions-growth nexus in two ways: firstly, it estimates a growth model that is spatially augmented to capture the countries’ dependence, and secondly it measures the countries’ dependence using a newly proposed concept called institutional proximity, in addition to the commonly used geography. Spatial Durbin model, that includes not only spatially lagged dependent variable but also spatially lagged explanatory variables, is shown to be the most appropriate to describe the panel dataset used in this study, which comprises of observations from 58 developing countries for year 1984–2007. The results find that institutions, specifically the property rights institutions, matter for growth in developing countries. The results also find an evidence of indirect institutional spillovers where institutions in a country lead to growth improvement in the country and subsequently generate positive spillover effects on neighbors’ economic growth. The results also yield robust support to the concept of augmented convergence process as a result of neighboring effects and its speed is relatively higher than the conventional β-convergence of a standard growth model. The greater convergence speed is consistent across a number of spatial models using both geographical and institutional proximity measures. The paper finally concludes with several policy implications for developing countries as far as the effects of institutional proximity and spillovers on growth and convergence are concerned. © 2017 The Society for Policy Modeling
Elsevier B.V.
1618938
English
Article
All Open Access; Green Open Access
author Ahmad M.; Hall S.G.
spellingShingle Ahmad M.; Hall S.G.
Economic growth and convergence: Do institutional proximity and spillovers matter?
author_facet Ahmad M.; Hall S.G.
author_sort Ahmad M.; Hall S.G.
title Economic growth and convergence: Do institutional proximity and spillovers matter?
title_short Economic growth and convergence: Do institutional proximity and spillovers matter?
title_full Economic growth and convergence: Do institutional proximity and spillovers matter?
title_fullStr Economic growth and convergence: Do institutional proximity and spillovers matter?
title_full_unstemmed Economic growth and convergence: Do institutional proximity and spillovers matter?
title_sort Economic growth and convergence: Do institutional proximity and spillovers matter?
publishDate 2017
container_title Journal of Policy Modeling
container_volume 39
container_issue 6
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2017.07.001
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85026645806&doi=10.1016%2fj.jpolmod.2017.07.001&partnerID=40&md5=10bd2ba0d550b8d9624988107db32dea
description This paper extends the existing studies on institutions-growth nexus in two ways: firstly, it estimates a growth model that is spatially augmented to capture the countries’ dependence, and secondly it measures the countries’ dependence using a newly proposed concept called institutional proximity, in addition to the commonly used geography. Spatial Durbin model, that includes not only spatially lagged dependent variable but also spatially lagged explanatory variables, is shown to be the most appropriate to describe the panel dataset used in this study, which comprises of observations from 58 developing countries for year 1984–2007. The results find that institutions, specifically the property rights institutions, matter for growth in developing countries. The results also find an evidence of indirect institutional spillovers where institutions in a country lead to growth improvement in the country and subsequently generate positive spillover effects on neighbors’ economic growth. The results also yield robust support to the concept of augmented convergence process as a result of neighboring effects and its speed is relatively higher than the conventional β-convergence of a standard growth model. The greater convergence speed is consistent across a number of spatial models using both geographical and institutional proximity measures. The paper finally concludes with several policy implications for developing countries as far as the effects of institutional proximity and spillovers on growth and convergence are concerned. © 2017 The Society for Policy Modeling
publisher Elsevier B.V.
issn 1618938
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Green Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677784775131136