Performance comparison of bolt withdrawal capacity for mengkulang glulam

In this study, a glulam as an engineered wood product (EWP) was produced using Mengkulang. The withdrawal capacity tests were conducted on the Mengkulang Glulam using bolts of 12 mm and 16 mm in diameter for parallel and perpendicular grain directions. The results indicated that the withdrawal capac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Mechanical Engineering
Main Author: Malek N.J.A.; Hassan R.; Kamari S.N.S.M.; Shakimon M.N.; Long C.Y.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UiTM Press 2016
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020073093&partnerID=40&md5=d6af6828b4fd2b345f43d6c02c7e6241
id 2-s2.0-85020073093
spelling 2-s2.0-85020073093
Malek N.J.A.; Hassan R.; Kamari S.N.S.M.; Shakimon M.N.; Long C.Y.
Performance comparison of bolt withdrawal capacity for mengkulang glulam
2016
Journal of Mechanical Engineering
13
2

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020073093&partnerID=40&md5=d6af6828b4fd2b345f43d6c02c7e6241
In this study, a glulam as an engineered wood product (EWP) was produced using Mengkulang. The withdrawal capacity tests were conducted on the Mengkulang Glulam using bolts of 12 mm and 16 mm in diameter for parallel and perpendicular grain directions. The results indicated that the withdrawal capacity of 12mm diameter bolt is lower than 16 mm bolt diameter by 80.16% when the bolts are inserted parallel to the grain direction. Meanwhile, the bolt withdrawal capacity for 12 mm is also lower than 16 mm by 64.82% when the bolts are inserted perpendicular to the grain direction. Twelve (12) mm bolt diameter inserted perpendicular to the grain provided higher withdrawal capacity than those inserted parallel by about 62.82%. On the other hand, the withdrawal capacity of 16 mm diameter bolt was observed to be higher in perpendicular to grain direction when compared to parallel insertion which differs by 33.82%. Hence, it can be concluded that the higher bolt diameter provides the better withdrawal capacity. The bolt performs better when it is inserted perpendicular to the grain rather than parallel to the grain directions. © 2016 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia.
UiTM Press
18235514
English
Article

author Malek N.J.A.; Hassan R.; Kamari S.N.S.M.; Shakimon M.N.; Long C.Y.
spellingShingle Malek N.J.A.; Hassan R.; Kamari S.N.S.M.; Shakimon M.N.; Long C.Y.
Performance comparison of bolt withdrawal capacity for mengkulang glulam
author_facet Malek N.J.A.; Hassan R.; Kamari S.N.S.M.; Shakimon M.N.; Long C.Y.
author_sort Malek N.J.A.; Hassan R.; Kamari S.N.S.M.; Shakimon M.N.; Long C.Y.
title Performance comparison of bolt withdrawal capacity for mengkulang glulam
title_short Performance comparison of bolt withdrawal capacity for mengkulang glulam
title_full Performance comparison of bolt withdrawal capacity for mengkulang glulam
title_fullStr Performance comparison of bolt withdrawal capacity for mengkulang glulam
title_full_unstemmed Performance comparison of bolt withdrawal capacity for mengkulang glulam
title_sort Performance comparison of bolt withdrawal capacity for mengkulang glulam
publishDate 2016
container_title Journal of Mechanical Engineering
container_volume 13
container_issue 2
doi_str_mv
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85020073093&partnerID=40&md5=d6af6828b4fd2b345f43d6c02c7e6241
description In this study, a glulam as an engineered wood product (EWP) was produced using Mengkulang. The withdrawal capacity tests were conducted on the Mengkulang Glulam using bolts of 12 mm and 16 mm in diameter for parallel and perpendicular grain directions. The results indicated that the withdrawal capacity of 12mm diameter bolt is lower than 16 mm bolt diameter by 80.16% when the bolts are inserted parallel to the grain direction. Meanwhile, the bolt withdrawal capacity for 12 mm is also lower than 16 mm by 64.82% when the bolts are inserted perpendicular to the grain direction. Twelve (12) mm bolt diameter inserted perpendicular to the grain provided higher withdrawal capacity than those inserted parallel by about 62.82%. On the other hand, the withdrawal capacity of 16 mm diameter bolt was observed to be higher in perpendicular to grain direction when compared to parallel insertion which differs by 33.82%. Hence, it can be concluded that the higher bolt diameter provides the better withdrawal capacity. The bolt performs better when it is inserted perpendicular to the grain rather than parallel to the grain directions. © 2016 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Malaysia.
publisher UiTM Press
issn 18235514
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871801638748160