Comparative assessment of water surface level using different discharge prediction models

Discharge is traditionally measured at gauge stations located at discrete positions along the river course. When the volume of water discharge is higher than the river bank, inundation to adjacent land occurs. Flood inundation mapping has largely relied on in situ discharge data. However, it cannot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Natural Hazards
Main Author: Mokhtar E.S.; Pradhan B.; Ghazali A.H.; Shafri H.Z.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Netherlands 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85017118664&doi=10.1007%2fs11069-017-2812-8&partnerID=40&md5=86ffcfc80a02471902105b413671e6d8
id 2-s2.0-85017118664
spelling 2-s2.0-85017118664
Mokhtar E.S.; Pradhan B.; Ghazali A.H.; Shafri H.Z.M.
Comparative assessment of water surface level using different discharge prediction models
2017
Natural Hazards
87
2
10.1007/s11069-017-2812-8
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85017118664&doi=10.1007%2fs11069-017-2812-8&partnerID=40&md5=86ffcfc80a02471902105b413671e6d8
Discharge is traditionally measured at gauge stations located at discrete positions along the river course. When the volume of water discharge is higher than the river bank, inundation to adjacent land occurs. Flood inundation mapping has largely relied on in situ discharge data. However, it cannot be accessed at ungauged sites. In recent literature, no comparative study on the impact of water level using different discharge models has been carried out. This paper evaluates the performance of three empirical formulas for discharge measurement to model flood inundation along Padang Terap River in Kedah, Malaysia, between October 31, 2010 and November 4, 2010. Water discharge was computed using three models, and the Manning-n values were assigned to the types of land use. Further, the rainfall obtained from gauge stations was interpolated using the Kriging interpolation method. Relative error and RMSE methods were used to evaluate the measured and predicted water surface elevation. The impact of predicted water surface elevation (WSE) from different land use types and terrain information was assessed. Dingman and Sharma’s model significantly presented good agreement between measured and predicted WSE with R2 = 0.8034, followed by Manning and Bjerklie equations with 0.8024 and 0.7997, respectively. Moreover, Dingman and Sharma’s model produced less RE and RMSE with 13.09% and 2.27 m compared with the others. Therefore, the estimated discharge can be used in ungauged sites for flood inundation modeling. Manning-n, elevation, and slope affected the WSE. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
Springer Netherlands
0921030X
English
Article

author Mokhtar E.S.; Pradhan B.; Ghazali A.H.; Shafri H.Z.M.
spellingShingle Mokhtar E.S.; Pradhan B.; Ghazali A.H.; Shafri H.Z.M.
Comparative assessment of water surface level using different discharge prediction models
author_facet Mokhtar E.S.; Pradhan B.; Ghazali A.H.; Shafri H.Z.M.
author_sort Mokhtar E.S.; Pradhan B.; Ghazali A.H.; Shafri H.Z.M.
title Comparative assessment of water surface level using different discharge prediction models
title_short Comparative assessment of water surface level using different discharge prediction models
title_full Comparative assessment of water surface level using different discharge prediction models
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of water surface level using different discharge prediction models
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of water surface level using different discharge prediction models
title_sort Comparative assessment of water surface level using different discharge prediction models
publishDate 2017
container_title Natural Hazards
container_volume 87
container_issue 2
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11069-017-2812-8
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85017118664&doi=10.1007%2fs11069-017-2812-8&partnerID=40&md5=86ffcfc80a02471902105b413671e6d8
description Discharge is traditionally measured at gauge stations located at discrete positions along the river course. When the volume of water discharge is higher than the river bank, inundation to adjacent land occurs. Flood inundation mapping has largely relied on in situ discharge data. However, it cannot be accessed at ungauged sites. In recent literature, no comparative study on the impact of water level using different discharge models has been carried out. This paper evaluates the performance of three empirical formulas for discharge measurement to model flood inundation along Padang Terap River in Kedah, Malaysia, between October 31, 2010 and November 4, 2010. Water discharge was computed using three models, and the Manning-n values were assigned to the types of land use. Further, the rainfall obtained from gauge stations was interpolated using the Kriging interpolation method. Relative error and RMSE methods were used to evaluate the measured and predicted water surface elevation. The impact of predicted water surface elevation (WSE) from different land use types and terrain information was assessed. Dingman and Sharma’s model significantly presented good agreement between measured and predicted WSE with R2 = 0.8034, followed by Manning and Bjerklie equations with 0.8024 and 0.7997, respectively. Moreover, Dingman and Sharma’s model produced less RE and RMSE with 13.09% and 2.27 m compared with the others. Therefore, the estimated discharge can be used in ungauged sites for flood inundation modeling. Manning-n, elevation, and slope affected the WSE. © 2017, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
publisher Springer Netherlands
issn 0921030X
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871800448614400