The performance of re-descending weight based partial robust M-regression methods

The presence of Partial Robust M-Regression (PRM) amongst other Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) techniques is mainly to offer a more robust and efficient method than the existing ones when data face outlier problem. PRMis conceptually different from other robust PLSR techniques because it pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences
Main Author: Mohamad M.; Ramli N.M.; Ghani N.A.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Natural Sciences Publishing 2017
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85010866458&doi=10.18576%2famis%2f110140&partnerID=40&md5=dae00008a51bc290eff6877be6fe64a2
id 2-s2.0-85010866458
spelling 2-s2.0-85010866458
Mohamad M.; Ramli N.M.; Ghani N.A.M.
The performance of re-descending weight based partial robust M-regression methods
2017
Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences
11
1
10.18576/amis/110140
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85010866458&doi=10.18576%2famis%2f110140&partnerID=40&md5=dae00008a51bc290eff6877be6fe64a2
The presence of Partial Robust M-Regression (PRM) amongst other Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) techniques is mainly to offer a more robust and efficient method than the existing ones when data face outlier problem. PRMis conceptually different from other robust PLSR techniques because it proposed the usage of M-estimator instead of a more commonly used Least Squares (LS) estimator. Recently, there are several efforts among researchers to further enhance the PRM performance. Among those methods are Partial Robust M-Regression (based on Bisquare Weight Function) (PRMBS) and Partial Robust M-Regression (based on Hampel Weight Function) (PRMH). These two methods are re-descending weight based PRMs which differ from the original monotonous weight based PRM. This study compares the performance of PLS, PRM, PRMBS and PRMH under numerous outlying conditions for both low and high dimensional data sets. Some analysis of real data sets and simulation results in this study show the robustness and the effectiveness of the modified PRM methods. © 2017 NSP.
Natural Sciences Publishing
19350090
English
Article

author Mohamad M.; Ramli N.M.; Ghani N.A.M.
spellingShingle Mohamad M.; Ramli N.M.; Ghani N.A.M.
The performance of re-descending weight based partial robust M-regression methods
author_facet Mohamad M.; Ramli N.M.; Ghani N.A.M.
author_sort Mohamad M.; Ramli N.M.; Ghani N.A.M.
title The performance of re-descending weight based partial robust M-regression methods
title_short The performance of re-descending weight based partial robust M-regression methods
title_full The performance of re-descending weight based partial robust M-regression methods
title_fullStr The performance of re-descending weight based partial robust M-regression methods
title_full_unstemmed The performance of re-descending weight based partial robust M-regression methods
title_sort The performance of re-descending weight based partial robust M-regression methods
publishDate 2017
container_title Applied Mathematics and Information Sciences
container_volume 11
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.18576/amis/110140
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85010866458&doi=10.18576%2famis%2f110140&partnerID=40&md5=dae00008a51bc290eff6877be6fe64a2
description The presence of Partial Robust M-Regression (PRM) amongst other Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) techniques is mainly to offer a more robust and efficient method than the existing ones when data face outlier problem. PRMis conceptually different from other robust PLSR techniques because it proposed the usage of M-estimator instead of a more commonly used Least Squares (LS) estimator. Recently, there are several efforts among researchers to further enhance the PRM performance. Among those methods are Partial Robust M-Regression (based on Bisquare Weight Function) (PRMBS) and Partial Robust M-Regression (based on Hampel Weight Function) (PRMH). These two methods are re-descending weight based PRMs which differ from the original monotonous weight based PRM. This study compares the performance of PLS, PRM, PRMBS and PRMH under numerous outlying conditions for both low and high dimensional data sets. Some analysis of real data sets and simulation results in this study show the robustness and the effectiveness of the modified PRM methods. © 2017 NSP.
publisher Natural Sciences Publishing
issn 19350090
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1814778508667256832