Comparative assessment of a self-sampling device and gynecologist sampling for cytology and HPV DNA detection in a rural and low resource setting: Malaysian experience

Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the agreement and differences between cervical self-sampling with a Kato device (KSSD) and gynecologist sampling for Pap cytology and human papillomavirus DNA (HPV DNA) detection. Materials and Methods: Women underwent self-sampling followed by gynecologis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Main Author: Latiff L.A.; Ibrahim Z.; Pei C.P.; Rahman S.A.; Akhtari-Zavare M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention 2016
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84954287687&doi=10.7314%2fAPJCP.2015.16.18.8495&partnerID=40&md5=72779ca45166b8951e1ef9307c4f2754
id 2-s2.0-84954287687
spelling 2-s2.0-84954287687
Latiff L.A.; Ibrahim Z.; Pei C.P.; Rahman S.A.; Akhtari-Zavare M.
Comparative assessment of a self-sampling device and gynecologist sampling for cytology and HPV DNA detection in a rural and low resource setting: Malaysian experience
2016
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
16
18
10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.18.8495
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84954287687&doi=10.7314%2fAPJCP.2015.16.18.8495&partnerID=40&md5=72779ca45166b8951e1ef9307c4f2754
Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the agreement and differences between cervical self-sampling with a Kato device (KSSD) and gynecologist sampling for Pap cytology and human papillomavirus DNA (HPV DNA) detection. Materials and Methods: Women underwent self-sampling followed by gynecologist sampling during screening at two primary health clinics. Pap cytology of cervical specimens was evaluated for specimen adequacy, presence of endocervical cells or transformation zone cells and cytological interpretation for cells abnormalities. Cervical specimens were also extracted and tested for HPV DNA detection. Positive HPV smears underwent gene sequencing and HPV genotyping by referring to the online NCBI gene bank. Results were compared between samplings by Kappa agreement and McNemar test. Results: For Pap specimen adequacy, KSSD showed 100% agreement with gynecologist sampling but had only 32.3% agreement for presence of endocervical cells. Both sampling showed 100% agreement with only 1 case detected HSIL favouring CIN2 for cytology result. HPV DNA detection showed 86.2%agreement (K=0.64, 95% CI 0.524-0.756, p=0.001) between samplings. KSSD and gynaecologist sampling identified high risk HPV in 17.3% and 23.9% respectively (p= 0.014). Conclusion: The self-sampling using Kato device can serve as a tool in Pap cytology and HPV DNA detection in low resource settings in Malaysia. Self-sampling devices such as KSSD can be used as an alternative technique to gynaecologist sampling for cervical cancer screening among rural populations in Malaysia.
Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention
15137368
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Latiff L.A.; Ibrahim Z.; Pei C.P.; Rahman S.A.; Akhtari-Zavare M.
spellingShingle Latiff L.A.; Ibrahim Z.; Pei C.P.; Rahman S.A.; Akhtari-Zavare M.
Comparative assessment of a self-sampling device and gynecologist sampling for cytology and HPV DNA detection in a rural and low resource setting: Malaysian experience
author_facet Latiff L.A.; Ibrahim Z.; Pei C.P.; Rahman S.A.; Akhtari-Zavare M.
author_sort Latiff L.A.; Ibrahim Z.; Pei C.P.; Rahman S.A.; Akhtari-Zavare M.
title Comparative assessment of a self-sampling device and gynecologist sampling for cytology and HPV DNA detection in a rural and low resource setting: Malaysian experience
title_short Comparative assessment of a self-sampling device and gynecologist sampling for cytology and HPV DNA detection in a rural and low resource setting: Malaysian experience
title_full Comparative assessment of a self-sampling device and gynecologist sampling for cytology and HPV DNA detection in a rural and low resource setting: Malaysian experience
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of a self-sampling device and gynecologist sampling for cytology and HPV DNA detection in a rural and low resource setting: Malaysian experience
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of a self-sampling device and gynecologist sampling for cytology and HPV DNA detection in a rural and low resource setting: Malaysian experience
title_sort Comparative assessment of a self-sampling device and gynecologist sampling for cytology and HPV DNA detection in a rural and low resource setting: Malaysian experience
publishDate 2016
container_title Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
container_volume 16
container_issue 18
doi_str_mv 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.18.8495
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84954287687&doi=10.7314%2fAPJCP.2015.16.18.8495&partnerID=40&md5=72779ca45166b8951e1ef9307c4f2754
description Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the agreement and differences between cervical self-sampling with a Kato device (KSSD) and gynecologist sampling for Pap cytology and human papillomavirus DNA (HPV DNA) detection. Materials and Methods: Women underwent self-sampling followed by gynecologist sampling during screening at two primary health clinics. Pap cytology of cervical specimens was evaluated for specimen adequacy, presence of endocervical cells or transformation zone cells and cytological interpretation for cells abnormalities. Cervical specimens were also extracted and tested for HPV DNA detection. Positive HPV smears underwent gene sequencing and HPV genotyping by referring to the online NCBI gene bank. Results were compared between samplings by Kappa agreement and McNemar test. Results: For Pap specimen adequacy, KSSD showed 100% agreement with gynecologist sampling but had only 32.3% agreement for presence of endocervical cells. Both sampling showed 100% agreement with only 1 case detected HSIL favouring CIN2 for cytology result. HPV DNA detection showed 86.2%agreement (K=0.64, 95% CI 0.524-0.756, p=0.001) between samplings. KSSD and gynaecologist sampling identified high risk HPV in 17.3% and 23.9% respectively (p= 0.014). Conclusion: The self-sampling using Kato device can serve as a tool in Pap cytology and HPV DNA detection in low resource settings in Malaysia. Self-sampling devices such as KSSD can be used as an alternative technique to gynaecologist sampling for cervical cancer screening among rural populations in Malaysia.
publisher Asian Pacific Organization for Cancer Prevention
issn 15137368
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1814778509937082368