International comparison of Shari’ah compliance screening standards

Purpose – This paper aims to review the Shari’ah investment screening methodologies of 34 prominent global Islamic finance users, including index providers, Shari’ah service providers, Islamic banks, a regulator, an association body and fund managers. Design/methodology/approach – A comparative anal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
Main Author: Ho C.S.F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. 2015
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84950254395&doi=10.1108%2fIMEFM-07-2014-0065&partnerID=40&md5=843925b5c5424d28b6121620553f0676
id 2-s2.0-84950254395
spelling 2-s2.0-84950254395
Ho C.S.F.
International comparison of Shari’ah compliance screening standards
2015
International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
8
2
10.1108/IMEFM-07-2014-0065
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84950254395&doi=10.1108%2fIMEFM-07-2014-0065&partnerID=40&md5=843925b5c5424d28b6121620553f0676
Purpose – This paper aims to review the Shari’ah investment screening methodologies of 34 prominent global Islamic finance users, including index providers, Shari’ah service providers, Islamic banks, a regulator, an association body and fund managers. Design/methodology/approach – A comparative analysis is performed to highlight the variances of the Shari’ah-compliant methods and principles practiced by these renowned institutions with the latest compiled data. Findings – The two sets of business screens and financial screens are profiled separately to clearly examine the similarities and differences between the different methodologies. Some of these practitioners are more specific in their listing of Shari’ah-impermissible activities, while some are more general in allowing more businesses to be included as permissible. The majority of these users practice a two-tier method of screening: qualitative and quantitative. Under quantitative screen, the range of allowable threshold ratios on non-permissible criteria differs slightly between them. Research limitations/implications – With the wide divergence in screening methodologies applied by practitioners, there is a general consensus in the acceptance of compliant assets from various countries and practice. Standardization is, therefore, seen as a need not only to make understanding of Shari’ah investments clear to investors but also to discourage misunderstandings between scholars and investors. Practical implications – The suggestion, therefore, is to set globally acceptable universal Shari’ah standard methodologies which are applicable by the world Islamic financial market. These standards which are relevant and logical to global ethical investing would further stimulate investments in Islamic finance. Social implications – With Shari’ah-compliant asset growing exponentially relative to the world’s financial assets, it is alleged that greater harmonization of the global screening methods would prevent misunderstanding and provide a clearer insight on Shari’ah investing, which could further accelerate growth of the Islamic finance sector worldwide. Originality/value – To provide a more transparent regulatory environment and build local and regional regulatory framework through establishment of standards, there should be more consistency with minimum barriers that prevent the industry from achieving its full potential. The paper also contributes to existing literature by documenting and analyzing the qualitative and quantitative screening procedures as practiced by a comprehensive set of global Islamic finance users. It is, therefore, important to share this knowledge as an effort toward greater understanding and harmonization of the practices at the global level to accelerate growth in the industry. © 2015, © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
17538394
English
Article
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
author Ho C.S.F.
spellingShingle Ho C.S.F.
International comparison of Shari’ah compliance screening standards
author_facet Ho C.S.F.
author_sort Ho C.S.F.
title International comparison of Shari’ah compliance screening standards
title_short International comparison of Shari’ah compliance screening standards
title_full International comparison of Shari’ah compliance screening standards
title_fullStr International comparison of Shari’ah compliance screening standards
title_full_unstemmed International comparison of Shari’ah compliance screening standards
title_sort International comparison of Shari’ah compliance screening standards
publishDate 2015
container_title International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management
container_volume 8
container_issue 2
doi_str_mv 10.1108/IMEFM-07-2014-0065
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84950254395&doi=10.1108%2fIMEFM-07-2014-0065&partnerID=40&md5=843925b5c5424d28b6121620553f0676
description Purpose – This paper aims to review the Shari’ah investment screening methodologies of 34 prominent global Islamic finance users, including index providers, Shari’ah service providers, Islamic banks, a regulator, an association body and fund managers. Design/methodology/approach – A comparative analysis is performed to highlight the variances of the Shari’ah-compliant methods and principles practiced by these renowned institutions with the latest compiled data. Findings – The two sets of business screens and financial screens are profiled separately to clearly examine the similarities and differences between the different methodologies. Some of these practitioners are more specific in their listing of Shari’ah-impermissible activities, while some are more general in allowing more businesses to be included as permissible. The majority of these users practice a two-tier method of screening: qualitative and quantitative. Under quantitative screen, the range of allowable threshold ratios on non-permissible criteria differs slightly between them. Research limitations/implications – With the wide divergence in screening methodologies applied by practitioners, there is a general consensus in the acceptance of compliant assets from various countries and practice. Standardization is, therefore, seen as a need not only to make understanding of Shari’ah investments clear to investors but also to discourage misunderstandings between scholars and investors. Practical implications – The suggestion, therefore, is to set globally acceptable universal Shari’ah standard methodologies which are applicable by the world Islamic financial market. These standards which are relevant and logical to global ethical investing would further stimulate investments in Islamic finance. Social implications – With Shari’ah-compliant asset growing exponentially relative to the world’s financial assets, it is alleged that greater harmonization of the global screening methods would prevent misunderstanding and provide a clearer insight on Shari’ah investing, which could further accelerate growth of the Islamic finance sector worldwide. Originality/value – To provide a more transparent regulatory environment and build local and regional regulatory framework through establishment of standards, there should be more consistency with minimum barriers that prevent the industry from achieving its full potential. The paper also contributes to existing literature by documenting and analyzing the qualitative and quantitative screening procedures as practiced by a comprehensive set of global Islamic finance users. It is, therefore, important to share this knowledge as an effort toward greater understanding and harmonization of the practices at the global level to accelerate growth in the industry. © 2015, © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
publisher Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.
issn 17538394
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Bronze Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678162035998720