The millennial researchers’ ethical decision model: A psychoanalytic approach

Little is known on the psychoanalytic approach underlies ethical decision impetus of millennial researchers in Malaysia, let alone an integrated model of ethical decision making due to dearth of empirical support to further understand their ethical wisdom and sensible conduct in research. The millen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advanced Science Letters
Main Author: Khalid K.; Azmi I.A.G.; Omar M.W.; Jani R.; Anuar M.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Scientific Publishers 2015
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84946052512&doi=10.1166%2fasl.2015.5994&partnerID=40&md5=2a87b3935cd4d0803614057eb3d2b5b8
id 2-s2.0-84946052512
spelling 2-s2.0-84946052512
Khalid K.; Azmi I.A.G.; Omar M.W.; Jani R.; Anuar M.M.
The millennial researchers’ ethical decision model: A psychoanalytic approach
2015
Advanced Science Letters
21
5
10.1166/asl.2015.5994
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84946052512&doi=10.1166%2fasl.2015.5994&partnerID=40&md5=2a87b3935cd4d0803614057eb3d2b5b8
Little is known on the psychoanalytic approach underlies ethical decision impetus of millennial researchers in Malaysia, let alone an integrated model of ethical decision making due to dearth of empirical support to further understand their ethical wisdom and sensible conduct in research. The millennials are those aged between 32 and below, and making up over 40 percent of the Malaysian population. Due to generational characteristics, millennial researchers are believed to have less ethical tolerance. The undervaluation of ethical dimensions has caused practical disability of researchers to describe social activities accurately, and to employ adequate justification of social hope and moral justification. Accordingly, this study is important to synthesis the underlying factors of ethical decision making for millennial researchers. This paper focuses on the triangulation of moral development theory, theory of reasoned action, and psychoanalytic theory to support the third thrust of National Higher Education Strategic Plan wherein to enhance research and innovation. The model will address the gap between theory, practice, and process that allows for the construction of complementary perspectives on ethical decision making in interdisciplinary research. Thus, it enriches the understanding to adequately explain social reality. This approach helps to generate a more complete knowledge about the contemporary issues in research. © 2015 American Scientific Publishers. All rights reserved.
American Scientific Publishers
19366612
English
Article

author Khalid K.; Azmi I.A.G.; Omar M.W.; Jani R.; Anuar M.M.
spellingShingle Khalid K.; Azmi I.A.G.; Omar M.W.; Jani R.; Anuar M.M.
The millennial researchers’ ethical decision model: A psychoanalytic approach
author_facet Khalid K.; Azmi I.A.G.; Omar M.W.; Jani R.; Anuar M.M.
author_sort Khalid K.; Azmi I.A.G.; Omar M.W.; Jani R.; Anuar M.M.
title The millennial researchers’ ethical decision model: A psychoanalytic approach
title_short The millennial researchers’ ethical decision model: A psychoanalytic approach
title_full The millennial researchers’ ethical decision model: A psychoanalytic approach
title_fullStr The millennial researchers’ ethical decision model: A psychoanalytic approach
title_full_unstemmed The millennial researchers’ ethical decision model: A psychoanalytic approach
title_sort The millennial researchers’ ethical decision model: A psychoanalytic approach
publishDate 2015
container_title Advanced Science Letters
container_volume 21
container_issue 5
doi_str_mv 10.1166/asl.2015.5994
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84946052512&doi=10.1166%2fasl.2015.5994&partnerID=40&md5=2a87b3935cd4d0803614057eb3d2b5b8
description Little is known on the psychoanalytic approach underlies ethical decision impetus of millennial researchers in Malaysia, let alone an integrated model of ethical decision making due to dearth of empirical support to further understand their ethical wisdom and sensible conduct in research. The millennials are those aged between 32 and below, and making up over 40 percent of the Malaysian population. Due to generational characteristics, millennial researchers are believed to have less ethical tolerance. The undervaluation of ethical dimensions has caused practical disability of researchers to describe social activities accurately, and to employ adequate justification of social hope and moral justification. Accordingly, this study is important to synthesis the underlying factors of ethical decision making for millennial researchers. This paper focuses on the triangulation of moral development theory, theory of reasoned action, and psychoanalytic theory to support the third thrust of National Higher Education Strategic Plan wherein to enhance research and innovation. The model will address the gap between theory, practice, and process that allows for the construction of complementary perspectives on ethical decision making in interdisciplinary research. Thus, it enriches the understanding to adequately explain social reality. This approach helps to generate a more complete knowledge about the contemporary issues in research. © 2015 American Scientific Publishers. All rights reserved.
publisher American Scientific Publishers
issn 19366612
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678161982521344