New technique for sizing optimization of a stand-alone photovoltaic system
This paper presents a method for sizing optimization in Stand-Alone Photovoltaic (SAPV) system. Evolutionary Programming (EP) was integrated in the sizing process to maximize the technical performance of the system. It is used to determine the optimal PV module, charge controller, inverter and batte...
Published in: | Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Little Lion Scientific
2014
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84907276825&partnerID=40&md5=03d63bf33bfe15b07976c9f386eef118 |
id |
2-s2.0-84907276825 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-84907276825 Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Shaari S.; Musirin I. New technique for sizing optimization of a stand-alone photovoltaic system 2014 Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 67 2 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84907276825&partnerID=40&md5=03d63bf33bfe15b07976c9f386eef118 This paper presents a method for sizing optimization in Stand-Alone Photovoltaic (SAPV) system. Evolutionary Programming (EP) was integrated in the sizing process to maximize the technical performance of the system. It is used to determine the optimal PV module, charge controller, inverter and battery such that the expected Performance Ratio (PR) of the SAPV system could be maximized. Two EP models, i.e. the Classical Evolutionary Programming (CEP) and Fast Evolutionary Programming (FEP) were tested in determining the best EP model for the EP-based sizing algorithm. In addition, an iterativebased sizing algorithm was developed to determine the optimal solution for benchmarking purposes. The results showed that CEP had outperformed the FEP by producing higher PR despite having almost similar computation time. However, the sizing algorithm using both EP models was also found to be much faster when compared to the iterative-based sizing algorithm, thus justifying the needs for incorporating EP in the sizing algorithm. © 2005 - 2014 JATIT & LLS. All rights reserved. Little Lion Scientific 19928645 English Article |
author |
Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Shaari S.; Musirin I. |
spellingShingle |
Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Shaari S.; Musirin I. New technique for sizing optimization of a stand-alone photovoltaic system |
author_facet |
Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Shaari S.; Musirin I. |
author_sort |
Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Shaari S.; Musirin I. |
title |
New technique for sizing optimization of a stand-alone photovoltaic system |
title_short |
New technique for sizing optimization of a stand-alone photovoltaic system |
title_full |
New technique for sizing optimization of a stand-alone photovoltaic system |
title_fullStr |
New technique for sizing optimization of a stand-alone photovoltaic system |
title_full_unstemmed |
New technique for sizing optimization of a stand-alone photovoltaic system |
title_sort |
New technique for sizing optimization of a stand-alone photovoltaic system |
publishDate |
2014 |
container_title |
Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology |
container_volume |
67 |
container_issue |
2 |
doi_str_mv |
|
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84907276825&partnerID=40&md5=03d63bf33bfe15b07976c9f386eef118 |
description |
This paper presents a method for sizing optimization in Stand-Alone Photovoltaic (SAPV) system. Evolutionary Programming (EP) was integrated in the sizing process to maximize the technical performance of the system. It is used to determine the optimal PV module, charge controller, inverter and battery such that the expected Performance Ratio (PR) of the SAPV system could be maximized. Two EP models, i.e. the Classical Evolutionary Programming (CEP) and Fast Evolutionary Programming (FEP) were tested in determining the best EP model for the EP-based sizing algorithm. In addition, an iterativebased sizing algorithm was developed to determine the optimal solution for benchmarking purposes. The results showed that CEP had outperformed the FEP by producing higher PR despite having almost similar computation time. However, the sizing algorithm using both EP models was also found to be much faster when compared to the iterative-based sizing algorithm, thus justifying the needs for incorporating EP in the sizing algorithm. © 2005 - 2014 JATIT & LLS. All rights reserved. |
publisher |
Little Lion Scientific |
issn |
19928645 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
|
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1809677912135172096 |