A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has become an essential tool in promoting sustainable development and environmental protection since it was formally introduced by National Environmental Policy (NEPA) in 1969. The acceptance and application of EIA as a key tool in ensuring green development...
Published in: | Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering) |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Penerbit UTM Press
2014
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906875177&doi=10.11113%2fjt.v70.2378&partnerID=40&md5=8f8dc8b5d0a687ce5adee254c51e39d1 |
id |
2-s2.0-84906875177 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-84906875177 Makmor M.; Ismail Z. A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada 2014 Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering) 70 1 10.11113/jt.v70.2378 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906875177&doi=10.11113%2fjt.v70.2378&partnerID=40&md5=8f8dc8b5d0a687ce5adee254c51e39d1 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has become an essential tool in promoting sustainable development and environmental protection since it was formally introduced by National Environmental Policy (NEPA) in 1969. The acceptance and application of EIA as a key tool in ensuring green development was overwhelming and has reflected positive feedbacks since its first introduction to the world community. The implementation of the EIA in various countries differs from one another as each country customised their own EIA process to cater their local development. This paper highlights the essentials of Environmental Impact Assessment and the EIA processes that have been adapted in four countries namely, Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada. The three developed countries have been chosen because they share the same legal system as Malaysia which is the common law. The objective of this paper is to analyse the differences and the similarities between the EIA processes in the four chosen countries. The analysis was carried out by utilising a comparative study which was achieved via literature review. The comparative study reveals the similarities and differences of each EIA process implemented in the four countries. Conclusively, the four countries possessed few similarities such as each country has their own legal instrument, a governing body responsible in administering their local EIA process and incorporates public participation in the EIA process. However, the Canadian EIA process has a more notable EIA process between the four EIA processes, whereby, it possesses the most elaborate process which involves public participation at every level and takes up to 365 days for the EIA assessment. © 2014 Penerbit UTM Press. All rights reserved. Penerbit UTM Press 1279696 English Article All Open Access; Bronze Open Access |
author |
Makmor M.; Ismail Z. |
spellingShingle |
Makmor M.; Ismail Z. A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada |
author_facet |
Makmor M.; Ismail Z. |
author_sort |
Makmor M.; Ismail Z. |
title |
A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada |
title_short |
A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada |
title_full |
A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada |
title_fullStr |
A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada |
title_sort |
A comparative study on EIA process in Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada |
publishDate |
2014 |
container_title |
Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering) |
container_volume |
70 |
container_issue |
1 |
doi_str_mv |
10.11113/jt.v70.2378 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84906875177&doi=10.11113%2fjt.v70.2378&partnerID=40&md5=8f8dc8b5d0a687ce5adee254c51e39d1 |
description |
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has become an essential tool in promoting sustainable development and environmental protection since it was formally introduced by National Environmental Policy (NEPA) in 1969. The acceptance and application of EIA as a key tool in ensuring green development was overwhelming and has reflected positive feedbacks since its first introduction to the world community. The implementation of the EIA in various countries differs from one another as each country customised their own EIA process to cater their local development. This paper highlights the essentials of Environmental Impact Assessment and the EIA processes that have been adapted in four countries namely, Malaysia, West Australia, New Zealand and Canada. The three developed countries have been chosen because they share the same legal system as Malaysia which is the common law. The objective of this paper is to analyse the differences and the similarities between the EIA processes in the four chosen countries. The analysis was carried out by utilising a comparative study which was achieved via literature review. The comparative study reveals the similarities and differences of each EIA process implemented in the four countries. Conclusively, the four countries possessed few similarities such as each country has their own legal instrument, a governing body responsible in administering their local EIA process and incorporates public participation in the EIA process. However, the Canadian EIA process has a more notable EIA process between the four EIA processes, whereby, it possesses the most elaborate process which involves public participation at every level and takes up to 365 days for the EIA assessment. © 2014 Penerbit UTM Press. All rights reserved. |
publisher |
Penerbit UTM Press |
issn |
1279696 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
All Open Access; Bronze Open Access |
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1809677610017357824 |