Application of automated grain sizing technique (AGS) for bed load samples at Rasil River: A case study for supply limited channel

Obtaining grain size distribution (GSD) is necessary in fluvial research. Conventional sieving and manual picking of particles are widely practiced to obtain representative sizes. Sieving method emulates the use of frequency by mass whereas manual picking method entails the use of frequency by count...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Catena
Main Author: Sulaiman M.S.; Sinnakaudan S.K.; Ng S.F.; Strom K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2014
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902509279&doi=10.1016%2fj.catena.2014.05.013&partnerID=40&md5=4dab49941b4cf30e1e3cb54c0bdab10a
id 2-s2.0-84902509279
spelling 2-s2.0-84902509279
Sulaiman M.S.; Sinnakaudan S.K.; Ng S.F.; Strom K.
Application of automated grain sizing technique (AGS) for bed load samples at Rasil River: A case study for supply limited channel
2014
Catena
121

10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.013
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902509279&doi=10.1016%2fj.catena.2014.05.013&partnerID=40&md5=4dab49941b4cf30e1e3cb54c0bdab10a
Obtaining grain size distribution (GSD) is necessary in fluvial research. Conventional sieving and manual picking of particles are widely practiced to obtain representative sizes. Sieving method emulates the use of frequency by mass whereas manual picking method entails the use of frequency by count technique. However, in some instances, bed load transport rates can be quite low, making it difficult to obtain sufficient sample mass for sieve analysis. Inadequate sample size may hinder the accuracy of GSD if the frequency by mass method is applied. Manual hand picking method is almost impossible for supply limited channel where majority of particles in motion are less than 8. mm. This paper tests the use of automated image processing techniques for obtaining size statistics of small sample mass of bed load samples. Comparison of GSD between the bed material and bed load successfully elucidate the applicability of automated grain sizing (AGS) technique for small size of bed load sample. Bed load GSD at supply limited channel exhibit the size selective pattern where GSD for bed load is much finer than GSD from surface material and almost overlay with GSD from subsurface material. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.
Elsevier
3418162
English
Article

author Sulaiman M.S.; Sinnakaudan S.K.; Ng S.F.; Strom K.
spellingShingle Sulaiman M.S.; Sinnakaudan S.K.; Ng S.F.; Strom K.
Application of automated grain sizing technique (AGS) for bed load samples at Rasil River: A case study for supply limited channel
author_facet Sulaiman M.S.; Sinnakaudan S.K.; Ng S.F.; Strom K.
author_sort Sulaiman M.S.; Sinnakaudan S.K.; Ng S.F.; Strom K.
title Application of automated grain sizing technique (AGS) for bed load samples at Rasil River: A case study for supply limited channel
title_short Application of automated grain sizing technique (AGS) for bed load samples at Rasil River: A case study for supply limited channel
title_full Application of automated grain sizing technique (AGS) for bed load samples at Rasil River: A case study for supply limited channel
title_fullStr Application of automated grain sizing technique (AGS) for bed load samples at Rasil River: A case study for supply limited channel
title_full_unstemmed Application of automated grain sizing technique (AGS) for bed load samples at Rasil River: A case study for supply limited channel
title_sort Application of automated grain sizing technique (AGS) for bed load samples at Rasil River: A case study for supply limited channel
publishDate 2014
container_title Catena
container_volume 121
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.catena.2014.05.013
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902509279&doi=10.1016%2fj.catena.2014.05.013&partnerID=40&md5=4dab49941b4cf30e1e3cb54c0bdab10a
description Obtaining grain size distribution (GSD) is necessary in fluvial research. Conventional sieving and manual picking of particles are widely practiced to obtain representative sizes. Sieving method emulates the use of frequency by mass whereas manual picking method entails the use of frequency by count technique. However, in some instances, bed load transport rates can be quite low, making it difficult to obtain sufficient sample mass for sieve analysis. Inadequate sample size may hinder the accuracy of GSD if the frequency by mass method is applied. Manual hand picking method is almost impossible for supply limited channel where majority of particles in motion are less than 8. mm. This paper tests the use of automated image processing techniques for obtaining size statistics of small sample mass of bed load samples. Comparison of GSD between the bed material and bed load successfully elucidate the applicability of automated grain sizing (AGS) technique for small size of bed load sample. Bed load GSD at supply limited channel exhibit the size selective pattern where GSD for bed load is much finer than GSD from surface material and almost overlay with GSD from subsurface material. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.
publisher Elsevier
issn 3418162
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677787762524160