Sharp turning and corner turning: Comparison of energy expenditure, gait parameters, and level of fatigue among community-dwelling elderly

This study compares energy expenditure (EE), gait parameters (GP), and level of fatigue (LOF) between 5-minute walking with sharp turning (ST) and corner turning (CT). Data were obtained from 29 community-dwelling elderly (mean age, 62.7 ± 3.54 years). For 5 minutes, in ST task, participants walked...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BioMed Research International
Main Author: Justine M.; Manaf H.; Sulaiman A.; Razi S.; Alias H.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902262323&doi=10.1155%2f2014%2f640321&partnerID=40&md5=4899e7457018b01d779e9447885a95aa
id 2-s2.0-84902262323
spelling 2-s2.0-84902262323
Justine M.; Manaf H.; Sulaiman A.; Razi S.; Alias H.A.
Sharp turning and corner turning: Comparison of energy expenditure, gait parameters, and level of fatigue among community-dwelling elderly
2014
BioMed Research International
2014

10.1155/2014/640321
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902262323&doi=10.1155%2f2014%2f640321&partnerID=40&md5=4899e7457018b01d779e9447885a95aa
This study compares energy expenditure (EE), gait parameters (GP), and level of fatigue (LOF) between 5-minute walking with sharp turning (ST) and corner turning (CT). Data were obtained from 29 community-dwelling elderly (mean age, 62.7 ± 3.54 years). For 5 minutes, in ST task, participants walked on a 3-meter pathway with 2 cones placed at each end (180° turning), while in CT task, participants walked on a 6-meter pathway with 4 cones placed at 4 corners (90° turning). The physiological cost index, pedometer, and 10-point Modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale were used to measure EE (beats/min), GP (no of steps), and LOF, respectively. Data were analyzed by using independent t -tests. EE during ST (0.62 ± 0.21 beats/min) was significantly higher than CT (0.48 ± 0.17 beats/min) (P < 0.05). GP (434 ± 92.93 steps) and LOF (1.40 ± 1.11) in ST were found to be lower compared to GP (463 ± 92.18 steps) and LOF (1.54 ± 1.34) in CT (All, P > 0.05). Higher EE in ST could be due to the difficulty in changing to a 180° direction, which may involve agility and different turning strategies (step-turn or pivot-turn) to adjust the posture carefully. In CT, participants could choose a step-turn strategy to change to a 90° direction, which was less challenging to postural control. © 2014 Maria Justine et al.
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
23146133
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
author Justine M.; Manaf H.; Sulaiman A.; Razi S.; Alias H.A.
spellingShingle Justine M.; Manaf H.; Sulaiman A.; Razi S.; Alias H.A.
Sharp turning and corner turning: Comparison of energy expenditure, gait parameters, and level of fatigue among community-dwelling elderly
author_facet Justine M.; Manaf H.; Sulaiman A.; Razi S.; Alias H.A.
author_sort Justine M.; Manaf H.; Sulaiman A.; Razi S.; Alias H.A.
title Sharp turning and corner turning: Comparison of energy expenditure, gait parameters, and level of fatigue among community-dwelling elderly
title_short Sharp turning and corner turning: Comparison of energy expenditure, gait parameters, and level of fatigue among community-dwelling elderly
title_full Sharp turning and corner turning: Comparison of energy expenditure, gait parameters, and level of fatigue among community-dwelling elderly
title_fullStr Sharp turning and corner turning: Comparison of energy expenditure, gait parameters, and level of fatigue among community-dwelling elderly
title_full_unstemmed Sharp turning and corner turning: Comparison of energy expenditure, gait parameters, and level of fatigue among community-dwelling elderly
title_sort Sharp turning and corner turning: Comparison of energy expenditure, gait parameters, and level of fatigue among community-dwelling elderly
publishDate 2014
container_title BioMed Research International
container_volume 2014
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2014/640321
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84902262323&doi=10.1155%2f2014%2f640321&partnerID=40&md5=4899e7457018b01d779e9447885a95aa
description This study compares energy expenditure (EE), gait parameters (GP), and level of fatigue (LOF) between 5-minute walking with sharp turning (ST) and corner turning (CT). Data were obtained from 29 community-dwelling elderly (mean age, 62.7 ± 3.54 years). For 5 minutes, in ST task, participants walked on a 3-meter pathway with 2 cones placed at each end (180° turning), while in CT task, participants walked on a 6-meter pathway with 4 cones placed at 4 corners (90° turning). The physiological cost index, pedometer, and 10-point Modified Borg Dyspnoea Scale were used to measure EE (beats/min), GP (no of steps), and LOF, respectively. Data were analyzed by using independent t -tests. EE during ST (0.62 ± 0.21 beats/min) was significantly higher than CT (0.48 ± 0.17 beats/min) (P < 0.05). GP (434 ± 92.93 steps) and LOF (1.40 ± 1.11) in ST were found to be lower compared to GP (463 ± 92.18 steps) and LOF (1.54 ± 1.34) in CT (All, P > 0.05). Higher EE in ST could be due to the difficulty in changing to a 180° direction, which may involve agility and different turning strategies (step-turn or pivot-turn) to adjust the posture carefully. In CT, participants could choose a step-turn strategy to change to a 90° direction, which was less challenging to postural control. © 2014 Maria Justine et al.
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
issn 23146133
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access; Green Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677610611900416