Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization

This paper presents an assessment of different evolutionary programming (EP) techniques for solving single-objective optimization problem. Evolutionary programming has been widely used and applied with success in solving many kinds of optimization problem. However there is no benchmark to test which...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, PEOCO 2013
Main Author: Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S.
Format: Conference paper
Language:English
Published: 2013
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882746924&doi=10.1109%2fPEOCO.2013.6564562&partnerID=40&md5=20718b19cbe5122bd4b063b9f458be79
id 2-s2.0-84882746924
spelling 2-s2.0-84882746924
Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S.
Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization
2013
Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, PEOCO 2013


10.1109/PEOCO.2013.6564562
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882746924&doi=10.1109%2fPEOCO.2013.6564562&partnerID=40&md5=20718b19cbe5122bd4b063b9f458be79
This paper presents an assessment of different evolutionary programming (EP) techniques for solving single-objective optimization problem. Evolutionary programming has been widely used and applied with success in solving many kinds of optimization problem. However there is no benchmark to test which techniques of EP models will give a better result in solving single objective optimization. Three distinct EP models used are classical evolutionary programming (CEP), fast evolutionary programming (FEP) and improved fast evolutionary programming (IFEP). These EP techniques considered here differ in terms of search operator- Gaussian, Cauchy and mixed Gaussian-Cauchy during mutation process. Therefore, selected test functions are used as a benchmark to test which models perform better for single-objective optimization. The three EP models showed that FEP is very good in having lowest computation time and significantly better than CEP and IFEP in terms of fitness solution. © 2013 IEEE.


English
Conference paper

author Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S.
spellingShingle Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S.
Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization
author_facet Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S.
author_sort Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S.
title Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization
title_short Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization
title_full Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization
title_fullStr Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization
title_sort Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization
publishDate 2013
container_title Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, PEOCO 2013
container_volume
container_issue
doi_str_mv 10.1109/PEOCO.2013.6564562
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882746924&doi=10.1109%2fPEOCO.2013.6564562&partnerID=40&md5=20718b19cbe5122bd4b063b9f458be79
description This paper presents an assessment of different evolutionary programming (EP) techniques for solving single-objective optimization problem. Evolutionary programming has been widely used and applied with success in solving many kinds of optimization problem. However there is no benchmark to test which techniques of EP models will give a better result in solving single objective optimization. Three distinct EP models used are classical evolutionary programming (CEP), fast evolutionary programming (FEP) and improved fast evolutionary programming (IFEP). These EP techniques considered here differ in terms of search operator- Gaussian, Cauchy and mixed Gaussian-Cauchy during mutation process. Therefore, selected test functions are used as a benchmark to test which models perform better for single-objective optimization. The three EP models showed that FEP is very good in having lowest computation time and significantly better than CEP and IFEP in terms of fitness solution. © 2013 IEEE.
publisher
issn
language English
format Conference paper
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677912360615936