Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization
This paper presents an assessment of different evolutionary programming (EP) techniques for solving single-objective optimization problem. Evolutionary programming has been widely used and applied with success in solving many kinds of optimization problem. However there is no benchmark to test which...
Published in: | Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, PEOCO 2013 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Conference paper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2013
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882746924&doi=10.1109%2fPEOCO.2013.6564562&partnerID=40&md5=20718b19cbe5122bd4b063b9f458be79 |
id |
2-s2.0-84882746924 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-84882746924 Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S. Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization 2013 Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, PEOCO 2013 10.1109/PEOCO.2013.6564562 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882746924&doi=10.1109%2fPEOCO.2013.6564562&partnerID=40&md5=20718b19cbe5122bd4b063b9f458be79 This paper presents an assessment of different evolutionary programming (EP) techniques for solving single-objective optimization problem. Evolutionary programming has been widely used and applied with success in solving many kinds of optimization problem. However there is no benchmark to test which techniques of EP models will give a better result in solving single objective optimization. Three distinct EP models used are classical evolutionary programming (CEP), fast evolutionary programming (FEP) and improved fast evolutionary programming (IFEP). These EP techniques considered here differ in terms of search operator- Gaussian, Cauchy and mixed Gaussian-Cauchy during mutation process. Therefore, selected test functions are used as a benchmark to test which models perform better for single-objective optimization. The three EP models showed that FEP is very good in having lowest computation time and significantly better than CEP and IFEP in terms of fitness solution. © 2013 IEEE. English Conference paper |
author |
Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S. |
spellingShingle |
Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S. Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization |
author_facet |
Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S. |
author_sort |
Abdul Aziz N.I.; Sulaiman S.I.; Musirin I.; Shaari S. |
title |
Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization |
title_short |
Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization |
title_full |
Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization |
title_sort |
Assessment of evolutionary programming models for single-objective optimization |
publishDate |
2013 |
container_title |
Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 7th International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference, PEOCO 2013 |
container_volume |
|
container_issue |
|
doi_str_mv |
10.1109/PEOCO.2013.6564562 |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882746924&doi=10.1109%2fPEOCO.2013.6564562&partnerID=40&md5=20718b19cbe5122bd4b063b9f458be79 |
description |
This paper presents an assessment of different evolutionary programming (EP) techniques for solving single-objective optimization problem. Evolutionary programming has been widely used and applied with success in solving many kinds of optimization problem. However there is no benchmark to test which techniques of EP models will give a better result in solving single objective optimization. Three distinct EP models used are classical evolutionary programming (CEP), fast evolutionary programming (FEP) and improved fast evolutionary programming (IFEP). These EP techniques considered here differ in terms of search operator- Gaussian, Cauchy and mixed Gaussian-Cauchy during mutation process. Therefore, selected test functions are used as a benchmark to test which models perform better for single-objective optimization. The three EP models showed that FEP is very good in having lowest computation time and significantly better than CEP and IFEP in terms of fitness solution. © 2013 IEEE. |
publisher |
|
issn |
|
language |
English |
format |
Conference paper |
accesstype |
|
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1809677912360615936 |