Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees

Purpose - Using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) criteria, the purpose of this study is to compare perceptions of Malaysian hotel quality managers (HQMs) and employees on leadership and workforce practices. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed methods approach was used. Questionn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:TQM Journal
Main Author: Sumarjan N.; Arendt S.W.; Shelley M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2013
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84874163134&doi=10.1108%2f17542731311299573&partnerID=40&md5=2da809c71ab0ae5fc900dc7d54917eea
id 2-s2.0-84874163134
spelling 2-s2.0-84874163134
Sumarjan N.; Arendt S.W.; Shelley M.
Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees
2013
TQM Journal
25
2
10.1108/17542731311299573
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84874163134&doi=10.1108%2f17542731311299573&partnerID=40&md5=2da809c71ab0ae5fc900dc7d54917eea
Purpose - Using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) criteria, the purpose of this study is to compare perceptions of Malaysian hotel quality managers (HQMs) and employees on leadership and workforce practices. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed methods approach was used. Questionnaires were distributed to 35 HQMs and 576 employees of three-, four-, and five-star hotels. Interviews were conducted with HQMs. Descriptive statistics, t-test, and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. All interviews were transcribed, hand coded, and analyzed for themes. Findings - Compared to hotel employees, HQMs had higher scores for all leadership and workforce items. Comparing managers' perceptions revealed a statistically significant difference between three- and four-star with five-star hotels on developing explicit quality policies and measurable objectives. For employees, there were statistically significant differences for most of the questionnaire items between three- and four-star with five-star hotels. HQMs identified inefficient communication systems and failure to develop explicit quality policies and objectives as main reasons for perception incongruences between employees and managers. Research limitations/implications - Two of the seven MBNQA criteria were used in this study; future research utilizing the other five criteria may be beneficial. Practical implications - This study provides hoteliers with quality practice perception differences between HQMs and employees in different star-rated hotels. Knowing these differences should compel hoteliers to review their leadership and workforce practices, identify reasons for discrepancies, and attempt to minimize the gap. Originality/value - No known studies in Malaysia, investigating this issue, have been conducted using a mixed methods approach. Additionally, this study provides empirical findings on quality practices from manager and employee perspectives. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

17542731
English
Article
All Open Access; Green Open Access
author Sumarjan N.; Arendt S.W.; Shelley M.
spellingShingle Sumarjan N.; Arendt S.W.; Shelley M.
Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees
author_facet Sumarjan N.; Arendt S.W.; Shelley M.
author_sort Sumarjan N.; Arendt S.W.; Shelley M.
title Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees
title_short Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees
title_full Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees
title_fullStr Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees
title_full_unstemmed Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees
title_sort Incongruent quality management perceptions between Malaysian hotel managers and employees
publishDate 2013
container_title TQM Journal
container_volume 25
container_issue 2
doi_str_mv 10.1108/17542731311299573
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84874163134&doi=10.1108%2f17542731311299573&partnerID=40&md5=2da809c71ab0ae5fc900dc7d54917eea
description Purpose - Using the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA) criteria, the purpose of this study is to compare perceptions of Malaysian hotel quality managers (HQMs) and employees on leadership and workforce practices. Design/methodology/approach - A mixed methods approach was used. Questionnaires were distributed to 35 HQMs and 576 employees of three-, four-, and five-star hotels. Interviews were conducted with HQMs. Descriptive statistics, t-test, and analysis of variance were used to analyze the data. All interviews were transcribed, hand coded, and analyzed for themes. Findings - Compared to hotel employees, HQMs had higher scores for all leadership and workforce items. Comparing managers' perceptions revealed a statistically significant difference between three- and four-star with five-star hotels on developing explicit quality policies and measurable objectives. For employees, there were statistically significant differences for most of the questionnaire items between three- and four-star with five-star hotels. HQMs identified inefficient communication systems and failure to develop explicit quality policies and objectives as main reasons for perception incongruences between employees and managers. Research limitations/implications - Two of the seven MBNQA criteria were used in this study; future research utilizing the other five criteria may be beneficial. Practical implications - This study provides hoteliers with quality practice perception differences between HQMs and employees in different star-rated hotels. Knowing these differences should compel hoteliers to review their leadership and workforce practices, identify reasons for discrepancies, and attempt to minimize the gap. Originality/value - No known studies in Malaysia, investigating this issue, have been conducted using a mixed methods approach. Additionally, this study provides empirical findings on quality practices from manager and employee perspectives. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
publisher
issn 17542731
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Green Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1812871802062372864