Structural performance of two types of wall slab connection under out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading

Currently, most of the high-rise buildings in Malaysia are constructed using tunnel form system. However, this type of structural system is still questionable of its safety under ground motion. Thus, the main objective of this study is to test and compare the structural performance of two types of w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
Main Author: Al-aghbari A.A.N.; Hamzah S.H.; Hamid N.H.A.; Rahman N.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2012
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84862651338&partnerID=40&md5=4165cddcac72c92988420ecf558fa4e4
id 2-s2.0-84862651338
spelling 2-s2.0-84862651338
Al-aghbari A.A.N.; Hamzah S.H.; Hamid N.H.A.; Rahman N.A.
Structural performance of two types of wall slab connection under out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading
2012
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
7
2

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84862651338&partnerID=40&md5=4165cddcac72c92988420ecf558fa4e4
Currently, most of the high-rise buildings in Malaysia are constructed using tunnel form system. However, this type of structural system is still questionable of its safety under ground motion. Thus, the main objective of this study is to test and compare the structural performance of two types of wall-slab connection namely cross and anchorage bracings under reversible quasi-static cyclic loading. Two identical sub-assemblage of wall-slab connections are designed, constructed and tested in heavy structural laboratory. A load actuator together with load cell was positioned horizontally at the upper part of the wall for applying the lateral cyclic load. The experimental result shows that the anchorage bracing connection has higher strength, higher ductility, better energy absorption and less structural damage as compared to cross-bracing connections. Based on this experiment, the ductility of anchorage bracing connection is μ=6 which satisfies the requirement of ductility for seismic code of practice. Anchorage bracing connection can resist earthquake loading better than cross-bracing connections. Therefore, it is recommended to the construction industry to adopt this kind of design together with the detailing which consists of double layer of wire fabric at the connections. As a conclusion, the anchorage bracing connection has better seismic performance as compared to cross-bracing connection under lateral cyclic loading. © School of Engineering, Taylor's University.

18234690
English
Article

author Al-aghbari A.A.N.; Hamzah S.H.; Hamid N.H.A.; Rahman N.A.
spellingShingle Al-aghbari A.A.N.; Hamzah S.H.; Hamid N.H.A.; Rahman N.A.
Structural performance of two types of wall slab connection under out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading
author_facet Al-aghbari A.A.N.; Hamzah S.H.; Hamid N.H.A.; Rahman N.A.
author_sort Al-aghbari A.A.N.; Hamzah S.H.; Hamid N.H.A.; Rahman N.A.
title Structural performance of two types of wall slab connection under out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading
title_short Structural performance of two types of wall slab connection under out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading
title_full Structural performance of two types of wall slab connection under out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading
title_fullStr Structural performance of two types of wall slab connection under out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading
title_full_unstemmed Structural performance of two types of wall slab connection under out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading
title_sort Structural performance of two types of wall slab connection under out-of-plane lateral cyclic loading
publishDate 2012
container_title Journal of Engineering Science and Technology
container_volume 7
container_issue 2
doi_str_mv
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84862651338&partnerID=40&md5=4165cddcac72c92988420ecf558fa4e4
description Currently, most of the high-rise buildings in Malaysia are constructed using tunnel form system. However, this type of structural system is still questionable of its safety under ground motion. Thus, the main objective of this study is to test and compare the structural performance of two types of wall-slab connection namely cross and anchorage bracings under reversible quasi-static cyclic loading. Two identical sub-assemblage of wall-slab connections are designed, constructed and tested in heavy structural laboratory. A load actuator together with load cell was positioned horizontally at the upper part of the wall for applying the lateral cyclic load. The experimental result shows that the anchorage bracing connection has higher strength, higher ductility, better energy absorption and less structural damage as compared to cross-bracing connections. Based on this experiment, the ductility of anchorage bracing connection is μ=6 which satisfies the requirement of ductility for seismic code of practice. Anchorage bracing connection can resist earthquake loading better than cross-bracing connections. Therefore, it is recommended to the construction industry to adopt this kind of design together with the detailing which consists of double layer of wire fabric at the connections. As a conclusion, the anchorage bracing connection has better seismic performance as compared to cross-bracing connection under lateral cyclic loading. © School of Engineering, Taylor's University.
publisher
issn 18234690
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809678489598558208