The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence

The current study aims to explore the potential moderating effects of the external monitors (institutional investors and board independence) on the relationship between firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level. The final sample consists of 95 public listed companies on Bursa Malays...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences
Main Author: Rahman R.A.; Mahamod M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Common Ground Research Networks 2008
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79952968975&doi=10.18848%2f1833-1882%2fcgp%2fv03i09%2f52704&partnerID=40&md5=1e7fedd115f30a17ac28bc6b0c9a5159
id 2-s2.0-79952968975
spelling 2-s2.0-79952968975
Rahman R.A.; Mahamod M.
The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence
2008
International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences
3
9
10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v03i09/52704
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79952968975&doi=10.18848%2f1833-1882%2fcgp%2fv03i09%2f52704&partnerID=40&md5=1e7fedd115f30a17ac28bc6b0c9a5159
The current study aims to explore the potential moderating effects of the external monitors (institutional investors and board independence) on the relationship between firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level. The final sample consists of 95 public listed companies on Bursa Malaysia from year 2002 to 2005. The results from the descriptive statistics reveal that the development of corporate governance practices in Malaysia is very low as the average of corporate governance disclosure level ranges from 50% in 2002 to 53% in 2005. This study found no empirical evidence supporting the hypotheses that firm performance, institutional shareholdings and board independence have significant relationship with corporate governance disclosure level. However, major institutional investors and effective board independence have moderating effects on the relationship between firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level. The result suggests that, the mere existence of major institutional investors itself (even with small percentage of shareholdings) and high proportions of independent non-executive directors, can influence the relationship between firm performance and corporate governance disclosure. In other words, major institutional investors not necessarily need to be the largest shareholders to take control over the company on behalf of minority shareholders. Even though institutional investors and high proportions of independent non-executive directors do not directly participate in monitoring the corporate governance disclosure practices, they still have an influence on management decision making processes for better firm performance towards better corporate governance disclosure. As such, the findings offer useful points of reference regarding the influences of external monitors to involve in decision making processes in corporate governance system. © Common Ground, Rashidah Abdul Rahman, Moktar Mahamod, All Rights Reserved.
Common Ground Research Networks
18331882
English
Article

author Rahman R.A.; Mahamod M.
spellingShingle Rahman R.A.; Mahamod M.
The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence
author_facet Rahman R.A.; Mahamod M.
author_sort Rahman R.A.; Mahamod M.
title The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence
title_short The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence
title_full The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence
title_fullStr The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence
title_full_unstemmed The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence
title_sort The effects of external monitors on firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level: Malaysian evidence
publishDate 2008
container_title International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences
container_volume 3
container_issue 9
doi_str_mv 10.18848/1833-1882/cgp/v03i09/52704
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79952968975&doi=10.18848%2f1833-1882%2fcgp%2fv03i09%2f52704&partnerID=40&md5=1e7fedd115f30a17ac28bc6b0c9a5159
description The current study aims to explore the potential moderating effects of the external monitors (institutional investors and board independence) on the relationship between firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level. The final sample consists of 95 public listed companies on Bursa Malaysia from year 2002 to 2005. The results from the descriptive statistics reveal that the development of corporate governance practices in Malaysia is very low as the average of corporate governance disclosure level ranges from 50% in 2002 to 53% in 2005. This study found no empirical evidence supporting the hypotheses that firm performance, institutional shareholdings and board independence have significant relationship with corporate governance disclosure level. However, major institutional investors and effective board independence have moderating effects on the relationship between firm performance and corporate governance disclosure level. The result suggests that, the mere existence of major institutional investors itself (even with small percentage of shareholdings) and high proportions of independent non-executive directors, can influence the relationship between firm performance and corporate governance disclosure. In other words, major institutional investors not necessarily need to be the largest shareholders to take control over the company on behalf of minority shareholders. Even though institutional investors and high proportions of independent non-executive directors do not directly participate in monitoring the corporate governance disclosure practices, they still have an influence on management decision making processes for better firm performance towards better corporate governance disclosure. As such, the findings offer useful points of reference regarding the influences of external monitors to involve in decision making processes in corporate governance system. © Common Ground, Rashidah Abdul Rahman, Moktar Mahamod, All Rights Reserved.
publisher Common Ground Research Networks
issn 18331882
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1820775480965464064