In a subgroup of high-risk asians, telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril and better tolerated in the prevention of cardiovascular events

Background and Objectives: Results of the recently published ONTARGET study (The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial) showed that telmisartan (80 mg/day) was non-inferior to ramipril (10 mg/ day) in reducing cardiovascular events. Clinicians in Asia doubt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Author: Dans A.L.; Teo K.; Gao P.; Chen J.-H.; Jae-Hyung K.; Yusoff K.; Chaithiraphan S.; Zhu J.; Lisheng L.; Yusuf S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2010
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78650969240&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0013694&partnerID=40&md5=7ad888439ab40ca8371492005fdb0613
id 2-s2.0-78650969240
spelling 2-s2.0-78650969240
Dans A.L.; Teo K.; Gao P.; Chen J.-H.; Jae-Hyung K.; Yusoff K.; Chaithiraphan S.; Zhu J.; Lisheng L.; Yusuf S.
In a subgroup of high-risk asians, telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril and better tolerated in the prevention of cardiovascular events
2010
PLoS ONE
5
12
10.1371/journal.pone.0013694
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78650969240&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0013694&partnerID=40&md5=7ad888439ab40ca8371492005fdb0613
Background and Objectives: Results of the recently published ONTARGET study (The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial) showed that telmisartan (80 mg/day) was non-inferior to ramipril (10 mg/ day) in reducing cardiovascular events. Clinicians in Asia doubt tolerability of these doses for their patients. We therefore analyzed data from this study and a parallel study TRANSCEND (Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease). Our objectives were to compare Asians and non-Asians with respect to the following: 1) Effectiveness of telmisartan vs. ramipril in reducing cardiovascular events; 2) Proportions who reached the full dose of telmisartan, ramipril or placebo; and 3) Proportions of overall discontinuations, and discontinuations due to adverse effects. Method: The ONTARGET study randomized 25,620 patients at risk of cardiovascular events to ramipril, telmisartan, or their combination. The primary composite endpoint was death caused by cardiovascular disease, acute MI, stroke, and hospitalization because of congestive heart failure. TRANSCEND randomized 5926 high-risk patients with a history of intolerance to ACE-inhibitors to telmisartan or placebo. The primary outcome was the same. In this substudy, we compared Asians and non-Asians as to how well they tolerated telmisartan (given in both studies) and ramipril (given in ONTARGET). Results: 1) Telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril in lowering the primary endpoint among Asians (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.13); 2) more Asians achieved the full dose of either drug; 3) less withdrew (overall); and 4) less withdrew for adverse effects. Furthermore, telmisartan was better tolerated than ramipril. This advantage was greater among Asians. Conclusion and Significance: Although Asians had lower BMI than non-Asians, Asians tolerated both drugs better. Regulatory agencies require reporting of safety and effectiveness data by ethnicity, but few comply with this requirement. This study shows that safety data in ethnic subgroups can help assess applicability of results to specific populations. © 2010 Dans et al.

19326203
English
Article
All Open Access; Gold Open Access
author Dans A.L.; Teo K.; Gao P.; Chen J.-H.; Jae-Hyung K.; Yusoff K.; Chaithiraphan S.; Zhu J.; Lisheng L.; Yusuf S.
spellingShingle Dans A.L.; Teo K.; Gao P.; Chen J.-H.; Jae-Hyung K.; Yusoff K.; Chaithiraphan S.; Zhu J.; Lisheng L.; Yusuf S.
In a subgroup of high-risk asians, telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril and better tolerated in the prevention of cardiovascular events
author_facet Dans A.L.; Teo K.; Gao P.; Chen J.-H.; Jae-Hyung K.; Yusoff K.; Chaithiraphan S.; Zhu J.; Lisheng L.; Yusuf S.
author_sort Dans A.L.; Teo K.; Gao P.; Chen J.-H.; Jae-Hyung K.; Yusoff K.; Chaithiraphan S.; Zhu J.; Lisheng L.; Yusuf S.
title In a subgroup of high-risk asians, telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril and better tolerated in the prevention of cardiovascular events
title_short In a subgroup of high-risk asians, telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril and better tolerated in the prevention of cardiovascular events
title_full In a subgroup of high-risk asians, telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril and better tolerated in the prevention of cardiovascular events
title_fullStr In a subgroup of high-risk asians, telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril and better tolerated in the prevention of cardiovascular events
title_full_unstemmed In a subgroup of high-risk asians, telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril and better tolerated in the prevention of cardiovascular events
title_sort In a subgroup of high-risk asians, telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril and better tolerated in the prevention of cardiovascular events
publishDate 2010
container_title PLoS ONE
container_volume 5
container_issue 12
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0013694
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78650969240&doi=10.1371%2fjournal.pone.0013694&partnerID=40&md5=7ad888439ab40ca8371492005fdb0613
description Background and Objectives: Results of the recently published ONTARGET study (The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in Combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial) showed that telmisartan (80 mg/day) was non-inferior to ramipril (10 mg/ day) in reducing cardiovascular events. Clinicians in Asia doubt tolerability of these doses for their patients. We therefore analyzed data from this study and a parallel study TRANSCEND (Telmisartan Randomized Assessment Study in ACE Intolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease). Our objectives were to compare Asians and non-Asians with respect to the following: 1) Effectiveness of telmisartan vs. ramipril in reducing cardiovascular events; 2) Proportions who reached the full dose of telmisartan, ramipril or placebo; and 3) Proportions of overall discontinuations, and discontinuations due to adverse effects. Method: The ONTARGET study randomized 25,620 patients at risk of cardiovascular events to ramipril, telmisartan, or their combination. The primary composite endpoint was death caused by cardiovascular disease, acute MI, stroke, and hospitalization because of congestive heart failure. TRANSCEND randomized 5926 high-risk patients with a history of intolerance to ACE-inhibitors to telmisartan or placebo. The primary outcome was the same. In this substudy, we compared Asians and non-Asians as to how well they tolerated telmisartan (given in both studies) and ramipril (given in ONTARGET). Results: 1) Telmisartan was non-inferior to ramipril in lowering the primary endpoint among Asians (RR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.13); 2) more Asians achieved the full dose of either drug; 3) less withdrew (overall); and 4) less withdrew for adverse effects. Furthermore, telmisartan was better tolerated than ramipril. This advantage was greater among Asians. Conclusion and Significance: Although Asians had lower BMI than non-Asians, Asians tolerated both drugs better. Regulatory agencies require reporting of safety and effectiveness data by ethnicity, but few comply with this requirement. This study shows that safety data in ethnic subgroups can help assess applicability of results to specific populations. © 2010 Dans et al.
publisher
issn 19326203
language English
format Article
accesstype All Open Access; Gold Open Access
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1814778510661648384