Mitigation of seismic financial risk of reinforced concrete walls by using Damage Avoidance Design

Seismic financial risk analyses of rocking precast prestressed reinforced concrete hollow-core walls designed using the Damage Avoidance Design (DAD) philosophy and of code-compliant ductile monolithic walls are performed based on the results of experimental investigation on the seismic behaviour of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology
Main Author: Khare R.K.; Dhakal R.P.; Mander J.B.; Hamid N.B.A.; Maniyar M.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2007
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-50249167281&partnerID=40&md5=1d2bceaeafb28eb6e85b48028ae3c872
id 2-s2.0-50249167281
spelling 2-s2.0-50249167281
Khare R.K.; Dhakal R.P.; Mander J.B.; Hamid N.B.A.; Maniyar M.M.
Mitigation of seismic financial risk of reinforced concrete walls by using Damage Avoidance Design
2007
ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology
44
3-Apr

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-50249167281&partnerID=40&md5=1d2bceaeafb28eb6e85b48028ae3c872
Seismic financial risk analyses of rocking precast prestressed reinforced concrete hollow-core walls designed using the Damage Avoidance Design (DAD) philosophy and of code-compliant ductile monolithic walls are performed based on the results of experimental investigation on the seismic behaviour of wall specimens representing the two different systems. Incremental dynamic analyses (IDA) are performed on nonlinear computational models of the two prototype walls, and experimental results are used to calibrate different damage states. Fragility curves are then developed for the two wall systems and the expected annual loss (EAL) is calculated based on a probabilistic financial risk assessment framework. The structural performance and financial implications of the two wall systems are compared. The study shows that it is the structurally acceptable minor-to-moderate damage that is responsible for a major share of the financial risk. Damage avoidance philosophy avoids this minor-moderate damage and hence reduces the financial risk greatly.

9720405
English
Article

author Khare R.K.; Dhakal R.P.; Mander J.B.; Hamid N.B.A.; Maniyar M.M.
spellingShingle Khare R.K.; Dhakal R.P.; Mander J.B.; Hamid N.B.A.; Maniyar M.M.
Mitigation of seismic financial risk of reinforced concrete walls by using Damage Avoidance Design
author_facet Khare R.K.; Dhakal R.P.; Mander J.B.; Hamid N.B.A.; Maniyar M.M.
author_sort Khare R.K.; Dhakal R.P.; Mander J.B.; Hamid N.B.A.; Maniyar M.M.
title Mitigation of seismic financial risk of reinforced concrete walls by using Damage Avoidance Design
title_short Mitigation of seismic financial risk of reinforced concrete walls by using Damage Avoidance Design
title_full Mitigation of seismic financial risk of reinforced concrete walls by using Damage Avoidance Design
title_fullStr Mitigation of seismic financial risk of reinforced concrete walls by using Damage Avoidance Design
title_full_unstemmed Mitigation of seismic financial risk of reinforced concrete walls by using Damage Avoidance Design
title_sort Mitigation of seismic financial risk of reinforced concrete walls by using Damage Avoidance Design
publishDate 2007
container_title ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology
container_volume 44
container_issue 3-Apr
doi_str_mv
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-50249167281&partnerID=40&md5=1d2bceaeafb28eb6e85b48028ae3c872
description Seismic financial risk analyses of rocking precast prestressed reinforced concrete hollow-core walls designed using the Damage Avoidance Design (DAD) philosophy and of code-compliant ductile monolithic walls are performed based on the results of experimental investigation on the seismic behaviour of wall specimens representing the two different systems. Incremental dynamic analyses (IDA) are performed on nonlinear computational models of the two prototype walls, and experimental results are used to calibrate different damage states. Fragility curves are then developed for the two wall systems and the expected annual loss (EAL) is calculated based on a probabilistic financial risk assessment framework. The structural performance and financial implications of the two wall systems are compared. The study shows that it is the structurally acceptable minor-to-moderate damage that is responsible for a major share of the financial risk. Damage avoidance philosophy avoids this minor-moderate damage and hence reduces the financial risk greatly.
publisher
issn 9720405
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1809677613446201344