Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics

This paper investigates indirect anaphora (IA) from a corpus-based linguistics (CBL) perspective. Indirect anaphora involves backward-pointing links between surface lexical items, such as demonstrative pronouns and objects, situations or concepts which are mentioned or hinted at in previous discours...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Main Author: Botley S.P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: John Benjamins Publishing Company 2006
Online Access:https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34248693471&doi=10.1075%2fijcl.11.1.04bot&partnerID=40&md5=7df0c6a01327c0e17475d470f8630529
id 2-s2.0-34248693471
spelling 2-s2.0-34248693471
Botley S.P.
Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics
2006
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
11
1
10.1075/ijcl.11.1.04bot
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34248693471&doi=10.1075%2fijcl.11.1.04bot&partnerID=40&md5=7df0c6a01327c0e17475d470f8630529
This paper investigates indirect anaphora (IA) from a corpus-based linguistics (CBL) perspective. Indirect anaphora involves backward-pointing links between surface lexical items, such as demonstrative pronouns and objects, situations or concepts which are mentioned or hinted at in previous discourse, but which are not linguistically encoded as surface grammatical elements such as nouns or noun phrases. This paper reports an empirical study of three types of IA, namely labelling (Francis 1986, 1989, 1994), situation reference (Fraurud 1992, 1992a) and text/discourse deixis (Lyons 1977, Levinson 1983). Although the paper reveals some discernable patterns in the use of IA across different genres, the study ultimately points to the challenges of identifying hard and fast categories of IA in a corpus of real-life examples. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.
John Benjamins Publishing Company
13846655
English
Article

author Botley S.P.
spellingShingle Botley S.P.
Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics
author_facet Botley S.P.
author_sort Botley S.P.
title Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics
title_short Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics
title_full Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics
title_fullStr Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics
title_full_unstemmed Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics
title_sort Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics
publishDate 2006
container_title International Journal of Corpus Linguistics
container_volume 11
container_issue 1
doi_str_mv 10.1075/ijcl.11.1.04bot
url https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34248693471&doi=10.1075%2fijcl.11.1.04bot&partnerID=40&md5=7df0c6a01327c0e17475d470f8630529
description This paper investigates indirect anaphora (IA) from a corpus-based linguistics (CBL) perspective. Indirect anaphora involves backward-pointing links between surface lexical items, such as demonstrative pronouns and objects, situations or concepts which are mentioned or hinted at in previous discourse, but which are not linguistically encoded as surface grammatical elements such as nouns or noun phrases. This paper reports an empirical study of three types of IA, namely labelling (Francis 1986, 1989, 1994), situation reference (Fraurud 1992, 1992a) and text/discourse deixis (Lyons 1977, Levinson 1983). Although the paper reveals some discernable patterns in the use of IA across different genres, the study ultimately points to the challenges of identifying hard and fast categories of IA in a corpus of real-life examples. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.
publisher John Benjamins Publishing Company
issn 13846655
language English
format Article
accesstype
record_format scopus
collection Scopus
_version_ 1820775481796984832