Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics
This paper investigates indirect anaphora (IA) from a corpus-based linguistics (CBL) perspective. Indirect anaphora involves backward-pointing links between surface lexical items, such as demonstrative pronouns and objects, situations or concepts which are mentioned or hinted at in previous discours...
Published in: | International Journal of Corpus Linguistics |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
John Benjamins Publishing Company
2006
|
Online Access: | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34248693471&doi=10.1075%2fijcl.11.1.04bot&partnerID=40&md5=7df0c6a01327c0e17475d470f8630529 |
id |
2-s2.0-34248693471 |
---|---|
spelling |
2-s2.0-34248693471 Botley S.P. Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics 2006 International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 11 1 10.1075/ijcl.11.1.04bot https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34248693471&doi=10.1075%2fijcl.11.1.04bot&partnerID=40&md5=7df0c6a01327c0e17475d470f8630529 This paper investigates indirect anaphora (IA) from a corpus-based linguistics (CBL) perspective. Indirect anaphora involves backward-pointing links between surface lexical items, such as demonstrative pronouns and objects, situations or concepts which are mentioned or hinted at in previous discourse, but which are not linguistically encoded as surface grammatical elements such as nouns or noun phrases. This paper reports an empirical study of three types of IA, namely labelling (Francis 1986, 1989, 1994), situation reference (Fraurud 1992, 1992a) and text/discourse deixis (Lyons 1977, Levinson 1983). Although the paper reveals some discernable patterns in the use of IA across different genres, the study ultimately points to the challenges of identifying hard and fast categories of IA in a corpus of real-life examples. © John Benjamins Publishing Company. John Benjamins Publishing Company 13846655 English Article |
author |
Botley S.P. |
spellingShingle |
Botley S.P. Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics |
author_facet |
Botley S.P. |
author_sort |
Botley S.P. |
title |
Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics |
title_short |
Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics |
title_full |
Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics |
title_fullStr |
Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics |
title_sort |
Indirect anaphora: Testing the limits of corpus-based linguistics |
publishDate |
2006 |
container_title |
International Journal of Corpus Linguistics |
container_volume |
11 |
container_issue |
1 |
doi_str_mv |
10.1075/ijcl.11.1.04bot |
url |
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-34248693471&doi=10.1075%2fijcl.11.1.04bot&partnerID=40&md5=7df0c6a01327c0e17475d470f8630529 |
description |
This paper investigates indirect anaphora (IA) from a corpus-based linguistics (CBL) perspective. Indirect anaphora involves backward-pointing links between surface lexical items, such as demonstrative pronouns and objects, situations or concepts which are mentioned or hinted at in previous discourse, but which are not linguistically encoded as surface grammatical elements such as nouns or noun phrases. This paper reports an empirical study of three types of IA, namely labelling (Francis 1986, 1989, 1994), situation reference (Fraurud 1992, 1992a) and text/discourse deixis (Lyons 1977, Levinson 1983). Although the paper reveals some discernable patterns in the use of IA across different genres, the study ultimately points to the challenges of identifying hard and fast categories of IA in a corpus of real-life examples. © John Benjamins Publishing Company. |
publisher |
John Benjamins Publishing Company |
issn |
13846655 |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
accesstype |
|
record_format |
scopus |
collection |
Scopus |
_version_ |
1820775481796984832 |